Village idiot,

LIAR, Stop lying about what I said. You are a LIAR and a Fraud

This shadowminister, brings up the subject of paedophilia yet again on the forum, he made the following admission in relation to his comments on "Paedophiles in the Green party" having firstly raised the subject here, on this unrelated topic, his favourite forum subject which has nothing to do with what is being discussed.

According to shadowminister the acts of paedophilia by the convicted child molester James Hayward of the WA National Party was nothing more than a "minor transgressions in other parties". According to this shadowminister a 54 year old man sexually interfering with a 6 year old girl for 2 years and being refereed to by the judge in the case when sentencing to 2 years 9 months imprisonment, as a "serious offence has been committed", its noting more than a "minor transgression"...INTERESTING to understand the character of the poster. There are those, who for the own reasons, are soft on this kind of thing. For me, throw the book at the bastards, and I don't care what political party, church, Boys Scouts etc, etc they are in!

Village idiot,

You are a LIAR and a FRAUD,

Where did I say that Hayward's crime was a minor transgression? You liar

Another "minor transgression". Home Affairs Minister Clare O'Neil has accuse the opposition of being weak on community safety, having this week voted against a law that would prevent the paedophile at the centre of the High Court case which led to his release, a person who Peter Dutton approved a visa for when he was minister from going near schools.

"On Monday we saw the opposition, led by the leader of the opposition, come into the parliament and vote to protect paedophiles over children," O'Neil told parliament on Wednesday.

Village idiot,

Lying again I see.

Albozo should include preventing all greens from going within 200m of schools to protect Australians.

"The systemic failures attached to the release of more than 100 criminals from immigration detention is hard to fathom. How any remotely competent government could find itself in the position Labor did on this issue is difficult to understand.

The High Court ruled the indefinite detention of stateless people was illegal. Nothing wrong with that; plenty of us would agree. The problem is what followed: a large number of detainees suddenly held illegally, because of the ruling, need to be released. This mightn’t be a problem were it not for the rap sheets most have: murderers, rapists and child sex offenders, with convictions rather than mere allegations. It’s bad.

The job of politicians in a democracy is to have new legislation at the ready to avoid a High Court judgment in one case having a cascading effect across the board, leaving citizens exposed.

So why is Labor so profoundly incompetent in the way it managed the fallout from the High Court decision? Because it wasn’t ready for it and has had to play catch-up. It didn’t have plans in place to respond swiftly to ensure dangerous criminals didn’t simply walk freely among us.

We have heard all manner of excuses why from Labor: the advice from the public service was that the court would go the other way; you can’t legislate around court decisions; circumventing the outcome was attempted but failed. It is a conga line of spin or outright misrepresentations and none of it answers how it could be that the government didn’t have a plan B, C or D to prevent what transpired.

This whole mess didn’t happen without warning. Long before the final judgment was handed down, in a procedural hearing Justice Jacqueline Gleeson flagged to the government the likelihood of what was about to happen. In other words, the government was warned and given time to do something, anything, to find a legal way to prevent what transpired."