Hard to top you ttbn, a nutter who threw away his money by being conned into joint The Corny Banana Party and donating his taxpayer welfare. What a joke that was. A nutter, is someone who PARROTS the words of a NOALITION hack politician and tries to present them as his own.

I wonder what wackjobs like Foxy, Paul and SR hope to gain by hounding other posters for their opinions rather than letting their own opinions speak for them. Their stalking and nagging doesn't appear to have made any difference to the majority posters and their opinions.

ttbn - the biggest stalker of them all on this
forum. Who repeats the same messages on each and every
discussion. Attacks people who have different opinions
to his - and when they react it's never his fault
but theirs. He'll go from one discussion to another
even when he disapproves of the topics.

Of course it is easier to attack someone personally based on
falsely drawn conclusions than it is to mount a reasoned
argument.

I've been called that "awful" woman, a communist, Marxist,
a Leftie, a whinger, arrogant, stupid, belonging in a sand-pit, should
be jailed, deported, I like talking about myself (when I
react and answer the accusations), I don't know
anything, and at the same time that I think I am superior,
and the list goes on.

And, I am the problem when I respond.

Still, as disturbing as these attacks are they pale in
comparison to the kinds of hostility directed at many
other people in our society. Especially those who
are Black, Indigenous, Asian, Muslim, lesbian, gay, trans,
politically progressive.

People who on a daily basis are targeted, threatened,
and attempted to be silenced.

Most online abuse comes from certain types of people
who aren't used to personal interaction. Yet
heaps of others manage to regularly share thoughts and
feelings without personally insulting or attacking others.

I've come to the conclusion that people who are nasty
and toxic online - are so because they're nasty and
toxic normally. Being online just allows them to be
themselves because of anonymity without fear of
consequences.

Lately I've taken to reacting more often. I'm not proud
of that. I should simply ignore and walk away. But you
get to the point when you simply have had enough and need
to react and giving someone a black eye you can't do
online.

However, I shall try to keep my reactions to a minimum.
Depending on my mood at the time (smile).

Now go ahead ttbn - attack me - go nuts!

As for calling us wackjobs, and saying that the "majority"
of posters here support you? Well in a nation of sheep,
and especially on this forum, a few brave posters form
a majority.

As usual, everything I say about her, she says about me. She's a mimic. It reminds me of one of my granddaughters - then a toddler - who would watch me like a hawk, and mimic everything I did. She got a giggle out of it; but, an old woman!

I wondered why she stalked and nagged other posters. She doesn't know why. We all comment on a subject that is put up for that purpose - express our opinions, say something the person responsible for the thread mightn't like - but few of us hound other posters for their different opinions on the same subject. That’s typical Marxist cancelling. Most of us are not Marxists, even when we don't march to the same drum.

Apparently I am "hostile" also to those who are Black, Indigenous, Asian, Muslim, lesbian, gay, trans, politically progressive. I am not averse to anyone because of their skin colour, their race or religion. I have made it clear that I would prefer an homogeneous society, as most honest people do, including those people I'm accused of being hostile to. I definitely do not like "political progressive" people; I am put off by people now called 'gay', and I follow the science and common sense that says it is absolutely absurd for people to think that they can change their sex.

So what? I am not responsible for harming "People who on a daily basis are targeted, threatened,and attempted to be silenced".

I'm not sure if she is slagging me off, or using the occasion to bleed over her pet virtue-signalling targets.

"Most online abuse comes from certain types of people who aren't used to personal interaction".

Well, there is some of the arrogance she mentions. She tells everyone "you know nothing about me", but she knows everything about others!

PS

I did not say that the majority of posters support me; they don't. Just Foxy being flexible with the truth.