Read the link I gave above. The Indigenous Agency
refutes the claim that the Uluru Statement is 26
pages. So it's up to you who you believe. The Murdoch
media or Indigenous people and agencies.

Your choice.

Dear Foxy,

Yes, people and entities have said one thing after saying the opposite regarding the Uluru statement's length. You do realise that this cultist treatment of facts is part of the reason that the yes campaign is losing 160,000 votes a week?

https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/09/uluru-itself-needs-some-truth-telliing/

Dear Foxy,

It appears that Murdoch mischief will next have people not understanding the difference between a bible and a concordance.

They really are sheep aren't they.

Dear Steele,

Thank you.

The Spectator is politically conservative. It keeps
publishing people like Alan Jones, Andrew Bolt,
Tony Abbott, allowing them to launder their extremist
views. As for Fester? - whatever rocks his boat.

I just get very frustrated, with deliberate attempts
at misinformation.

The statement is 26 pages long. Its always been 26 pages long.

BUT..... much of the information in the report is unacceptable to the majority of voters so the leaders of the Yes-terday cult have been trying to suppress that extra data by pretending the report is 1 page long. And of course their slack-jawed followers have accepted that without demur.

1 page long or 26 pages long. Its a storm in a tea-cup. But after the Voice fails, the Yes-terday clan will claim this was the reason for the failure....hint: it isn't.

Still, it you want to see what they have in store for us, or at hope to have in store for us, read the whole 26 pages, especially since they'd prefer you didn't.

"I hadn't wanted to post a link to someone's private diary but it is reproduced in full here:"

But, but but....the diary is unverified </grin>