The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Is the Uluru statement about sovereignty?

Is the Uluru statement about sovereignty?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All
A Voice already exists in http://www.niaa.gov.au/ with a $2,000,000,000 budget. What is envisaged by Uluru is more than just a voice to the colonial government, it is self-government. Albanese's Voice alone will not close the gap, as it already exists; some aboriginals want self-rule independent of what they consider white rule.
Posted by Josephus, Monday, 13 March 2023 7:56:07 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Yep. Saw the NIAA business last night. Everything the Voice is supposed to do this organisation is claiming to be doing NOW. Whether or not it is - and there is no evidence that it is doing anything other than hoovering up taxes - the Socialists and Blakticvists still want the Voice.

Only the Australian voters can stop the Voice from getting into their Constitution by voting NO! The government can enact the legislation any time they want, without a referendum. So, why don't they? Everything about this Voice stinks to High Heaven. Instead of whining for "details" the useless opposition should be campaigning against it - showing some courage and usefulness - 24/7 until the rubbish is dropped altogether and forever.
Posted by ttbn, Monday, 13 March 2023 8:37:10 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Proud Boy Jose'

In your usual fashion you misrepresent the meaning, and the intent, of the 2017 'Uluru Statement From The Heart'. Aboriginal sovereignty, as much as you dislike it, has never been ceded, "and co-exists with the sovereignty of the Crown". 'The Voice' is not concerned with sovereignty, it is a vote for Aboriginal recognition within the Australian Constitution, giving an Aboriginal voice to parliament. I don't believe you are ignorant of these facts, but choose to be purposely obtuse because of your bigoted attitudes. Take comfort, there are those old men on the Forum, sitting in the 'Klan Stand' who will agree with every word you say.
Posted by Paul1405, Tuesday, 14 March 2023 6:39:46 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Paul you are misleading, aboriginals already have a Voice in the NIAA which operates with a budget of almost $2 billion dollars to deal with the needs of aboriginal communities. Vote "No" to a Voice in the Constitution.
Posted by Josephus, Tuesday, 14 March 2023 8:26:37 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Because of the diversity of aboriginal opinion, the Voice would always be going to the High Court to settle disputes. There is no chance of a treaty with over 200 tribal families as each has different requests on their land. What is needed is unity not diversity, which the Marxists promote to make unstable Western society.
Posted by Josephus, Tuesday, 14 March 2023 8:39:28 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Voting Yes will bring an end to the guilt industry but at an even higher cost than so far !
Posted by Indyvidual, Tuesday, 14 March 2023 9:10:43 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy