These ideas have been created by unelected public officals, who have continuous tenancy in a public funded position in federal, state and local governments. These positions transcend the tenancy of elected politicians. (That is not to excuse the dopey politician who must recieve ideas, from somewhere, into a barren mind).

The word LAND is polarising the readers here and elswhere.

What I would like to offer to the debate is that we must understand our position if, and when, the word land is exchanged for Medicare, social security, old age pension, superannuation, freehold tile to land, privacy, one party government (although they dont really need this one), freehold title to homes, non jury trials, guilt without trial, incarceration without a trial, restricted internet use (banning blogs and forums), the end of public hospitals, and the end of open public education.

I may have overstated the potential position, but everything has to start somewhere.

It has started with land.

You can do no harm by supporting this move to have the governments act, only, in accordance with the "United Kingdom colony of Australia constitution"