The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > The economic case for slashing carbon emissions > Comments

The economic case for slashing carbon emissions : Comments

By Frank Ackerman, published 30/10/2009

A group of economists maintain that striving to meet a target of 350 parts per million of CO2 in the atmosphere is a smart investment.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All
The problem with GTL and CTL is the poor thermal efficiency of the the processes. GTL is used at Qatar where as a "stranded" gas source, it is easier to transport normal petroleum liquids than liquefy and transport LNG. CTL was introduced in wartime Germany to keep the tanks rolling and in South Africa where it avoided sanctions. Sasol is now licensing the process to China.

As far as the planned carbon emission reductions of 80% by 2050 - no problem - the passing of peak oil, gas, coal will do it automatically with no need for carbon taxes.

There will be just a modicum of nuclear power as uranium supplies also run down. It is noted that the Olympic Dam expansion decision is put off until 2013 and even if it goes ahead, after five years of digging to 2018, some will uranium will go to China in copper concentrate, before any gets to the West.

Time for a reality check!
Posted by John Busby, Monday, 2 November 2009 5:42:34 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy