The Forum > Article Comments > The cost of women’s liberation > Comments
The cost of women’s liberation : Comments
By Brian Holden, published 23/10/2009The feminists of the 1960s set out to enlighten the average woman of the oppressed state that she was not aware she was in.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
-
- All
When I do think back, both parents worked, my father two jobs often, I still remember being poorer than some single wage packet families. I know they had a medical debt from when they first arrived as immigrants having no medicare back then, and was 10 years to repay if I recall correctly. So the difference may have been that obligation. So my mother was enslaved to debt.
However debts were repaid. Mortgages were based on a single income only, irregardless if the wife also worked. So debt was manageable and the mortgage paid off, no credit card debt so life was good once the kids fled the nest.
So when the wife's income was allowed to be used to assess how much one could borrow it doubled the amount to purchase driving up real estate prices and enslaving the wife (or house husband). So maybe it is simply debt that has taken this choice away from mums. When we stopped the sexist attitude of not lending money to women perhaps we should have reduced the amount as a percentage that could be borrowed overall.