The Forum > Article Comments > Unrealistic proposals > Comments
Unrealistic proposals : Comments
By Martin Nicholson, published 27/8/2009Climate change policy: it seems the stronger the feelings, the higher the targets demanded but the more unrealistic the proposals.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
-
- All
In response to Curmudgeon's point about wind power, The Greens haven't yet caught up with the US wind industry's view of their own place in the world. In a DOE report titled "20% Wind Energy by 2030" put out last year and formally assessed by the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) they state the following:
"Wind is an energy resource, not a capacity resource. Capacity resources are those that can be available on demand, particularly to meet system peak loads. Because only a fraction of total wind capacity has a high probability of running consistently, wind generators have limited capacity value."
and
"It is not appropriate to think in terms of “backing up” the wind because the wind capacity was installed to generate, low-emissions energy, but not to meet load growth requirements. Wind power cannot replace the need for many “capacity resources,” which are generators and dispatchable load that are available to be used when needed to meet peak load. If wind has some capacity value for reliability planning purposes, that should be viewed as a bonus, but not a necessity."
Breathtaking stuff for all those wind advocates who have worked so hard to prove that wind power can compare to conventional generators.
All of which says don't expect to decommission any coal, gas or nuclear plants to any great degree from installing lots of wind power.