The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Junk the jihad, it's jargon we need > Comments

Junk the jihad, it's jargon we need : Comments

By Richard Ackland, published 13/7/2009

Attorney-General Robert McClelland is confident that if we get the lingo right 'community harmony' will be strengthened and extremists 'disempowered'.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All
Robert McClelland and the denizens of his Department are the direct descendants of Voodoo Magic. In past primitive Africa the Medicine Man would UTTER a word and evil would disappear. In modern Australia, America, and Europe it appears that most of its politicians believe that by NOT UTTERING the word “jihad” or “Islamist terrorist” the evil of terrorism would disappear. The enlightened Attorney-General’s Department by practising Voodoo Magic they might just eradicate Muslim terrorism.

http://kotzas12.xanga.com
Posted by Themistocles, Monday, 13 July 2009 6:33:00 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
If Robert McClelland and Richard Ackland think that Australia is a great place to be a Muslim, they are right. The Courts of Australia and Baghdad are exactly the same, and merge Church and State into one totally terrorist organization. Because Muslims have been brought up in a State of Fear, generated by draconian penalties, and even the regular application of the death penalty, they feel completely at home in the benevolent dictatorship exercised by Judges and Magistrates in Australia.

In Australia a free press, more or less curbs the excesses of the Judges, and a Court of Appeal does too, but the fact remains that a Christian court has a jury, and the merger of Church and State under Islam has Courts. England has Courts now, instead of courts in all civil cases, and its no wonder they are getting trouble from their three million Muslim members of their society.

If the Islamists knew they had to face a Christian court every time they committed an offence, and a Christian court was restored to its prerogative of sentencing as well, as the finding of guilt or innocence, then they would probably no longer laugh at our justice system, and think twice about offending.

The Magna Carta in force in England in 1960, published in Halsbury’s Statutes of England which can be located in Fisher Library in Sydney, discloses that both sentencing and conviction was the prerogative of a jury. A fine was always to be offered, since 1275, when the First Statute of Westminster was enacted to give people a choice, fine or jail, and the right to free election. Election meant trial by jury or Judges at Bar. It had to be three Judges though, not one.

This Statute is fully transcribed in the Imperial Acts Application Act 1980 ( Vic). Its not in New South Wales but then as Islamists we have our own country here in New South Wales, and no way to tell them it is not Christian to be a republic, and forbidden by the Australian Constitution. Sticks and stones break bones. Words never.
Posted by Peter the Believer, Monday, 13 July 2009 6:46:49 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy