CJ Morgan

So the Greens don’t want to control everything, they just want to control
the air http://greens.org.au/node/764
the water http://greens.org.au/node/800
the land http://greens.org.au/node/761
the seas http://greens.org.au/node/783
what farmers can grow and how they can grow it http://greens.org.au/node/797
the distribution and abundance of species http://greens.org.au/node/761
primary, secondary and tertiary industry http://greens.org.au/node/786
Any and every human action that might affect ‘the environment’, namely, everything: http://greens.org.au/policies
etc. etc. etc.

The Greens are totalitarian fascists, what I have said is fact, and what you have replied are lies.

But it gets worse. The state of total government control of the economy and ecology that the Greens dream of, can only result in utter environmental and economic chaos: http://mises.org/story/1675
which is why that happened last time this deluded and destructive belief system was tried,
but their economic illiteracy prevents them from understanding why socialism just keeps on failing

Er, Ding - the Greens no more want to "control" anything than does any political party that has a coherent set of policies. Thanks though for posting links to some actual Green policies, rather than your spittle-flecked characterisation of them. I encourage others to click on the links and read the policies for themselves.

Undoubtedly anybody who does so will notice that they don't in any way resemble your hysterical claims about wishing to "control" the water, land, seas etc.

As far as your "totalitarian fascists" claim goes, do you actually know what those terms mean? You claim that the Greens are both socialist and economically illiterate, but you certainly haven't provided any evidence for either in your rabid ranting thus far.

Until you do, I think I'll relegate you to my 'wingnut frootloop' category of OLO members. Don't anticipate further interaction until you learn to make a logical argument that cites actual evidence that supports it.

CJ

Maybe you're being a tad harsh on W-A-L here. We all make mistakes, such as the typo in the title of the following Chuck Berry video.

Please enjoy as much for Chuck as for the inimitable Rolf Harris, and thank you for inspiring me to locate this little gem. (Ancient, yes, but still very pertinent, given it was recorded in response to an attack of the wowsers).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MLBfwblps8&feature=related

CJ, do you really believe any of this stuff you post?

Much as most of the greens try to control them selves enough to not enunciate their real desires as policies, they fail often enough for some of us to see through to the truth.

So I guess you're another that doesn't have the capacity to actually address Greens policies, rather than spout mindless slogans, Hasbeen?

Admit it, old son - you haven't read the policies to which Dingbat kindly provided links, have you?

Whilst Christopher has rightly rebuked Wing Ah Ling for evidently not informing himself about the Greens' policies, I think he also needs to follow his own advice.

The most striking example is where after a debate that has gone on for over six months over unanswered questions about the 9/11 terrorist attacks Christopher has yet to demonstrate to anyone that he has read and comprehended any of the material from the 9/11 Truth Movement (see http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=2166&page=82#59400 http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=2166&page=0).

After almost 7 months, the reasons why Christopher still insists that the US Government's (several) explanation(s) for the 9/11 attacks must be accepted uncritically remain a mystery.