The Forum > Article Comments > The politics of bushfires > Comments
The politics of bushfires : Comments
By Mark Poynter, published 18/3/2009Black Saturday Royal Commission must examine the influence of the ‘green’ culture on forest fire management.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
-
- All
In your previous post that I was referring to, you quoted from a WAFA submission dated October 2003. Because of my many years of dealing with WAFA, my instinct is to assume that they have quoted the CALM annual reports out of context. For example, spring burning is cheaper to undertake than autumn burning but it is environmentally more damaging, so, without knowing the context of the quotes from CALM's reports, it's hard to know exactly what message CALM was trying to get across (although the WAFA modus operandi was to always bag CALM no matter what they said).
Your long extract from the CALM 2001-2 annual report highlights my concerns about the impact of political and public pressure on both CALM's preparedness to burn and on the lack of funding available to CALM at that time (funding was significantly increased in the following years).
Yes, smoke is damaging to health but wildfire is even more damaging: it kills, as the 210 dead from the Victorian bushfires of last month show.
The bottom line is that, while DEC can and should do a better job of prescribed burning with greater attention paid to protecting environmental values, politicians need to fund DEC better so they can do this job properly. As well, people like you and I need to publicly support DEC and be willing to put up with smoke a few times a year in exchange for a forest environment that is much more fire safe.