The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Common myths of the population debate > Comments

Common myths of the population debate : Comments

By Michael Lardelli, published 13/3/2009

How bad does the degradation of our environment and the decline of our economy need to be before we accept the need for a smaller, stable population?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 10
  7. 11
  8. 12
  9. Page 13
  10. All
AB stated: " ...my reading of the relevant Productivity Commission report doesn’t match that assessment. Despite it taking a very narrow and short-term measure of what constitutes economic and social benefits, it still found a small net gain from migration."

Those "benefits" amounted to a 0.06 percent increase in per capita income. In other words, chicken feed. And when balanced against some of the substantial costs of immigration, such as downward pressure on wages, higher housing costs, increased consumption of natural resources, higher water costs, a larger current account deficit, and increasing welfare and tax burdens on state and local governments, those "benefits" disappear completely.

Immigration is simply a way of driving down wages and boosting demand for goods and services. It benefits the big end of town and those ethnocentric minorities seeking the importation of more of their own, but nobody else.
Posted by Efranke, Monday, 23 March 2009 10:19:03 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 10
  7. 11
  8. 12
  9. Page 13
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy