The Forum > Article Comments > Common myths of the population debate > Comments
Common myths of the population debate : Comments
By Michael Lardelli, published 13/3/2009How bad does the degradation of our environment and the decline of our economy need to be before we accept the need for a smaller, stable population?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Page 13
-
- All
Posted by Efranke, Monday, 23 March 2009 10:19:03 PM
|
Those "benefits" amounted to a 0.06 percent increase in per capita income. In other words, chicken feed. And when balanced against some of the substantial costs of immigration, such as downward pressure on wages, higher housing costs, increased consumption of natural resources, higher water costs, a larger current account deficit, and increasing welfare and tax burdens on state and local governments, those "benefits" disappear completely.
Immigration is simply a way of driving down wages and boosting demand for goods and services. It benefits the big end of town and those ethnocentric minorities seeking the importation of more of their own, but nobody else.