The Forum > Article Comments > The fault lines of the Rudd stimulus package(s) > Comments
The fault lines of the Rudd stimulus package(s) : Comments
By Arthur Thomas, published 11/3/2009If the Rudd Government had exercised restraint and ignored rhetoric and grandstanding, the original $10.4 billion would still be in reserve for the future.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
-
- All
We sent our industries overseas; now we are sending hard cash.
We have a low dollar, but our exports are in trouble. More people are seeking pensions because of the recession’s effect on superannuation – something governments decided should be compulsory, instead of allowing individuals to make their own investment decisions.
While the dummy is sprouting about plans numbered from 1 to infinity to save and create jobs, jobs are being lost right, left and centre, never to reappear as everything goes overseas.
‘Free’ trade and globalisation is now biting us on the bum as it was always going to.
Rudd the Dud encourages more lending for housing, hands out ‘packages’ and we all wait for the time when interest rates rise again, and starry-eyed young people start losing their houses again because they are borrowing $300,000 plus with the Dud’s encouragement. Banks are letting people borrow 95%; some builders are accepting just whatever the government handout is by way of a deposit.
“Can we trust our lawmakers to make the right decisions?” asks the author. No. We can and never could trust an ALP Government to make sensible economic decisions.
Only governments that balance the books and cut back spending on all but essential infrastructure can be trusted in a crisis.