The Forum > Article Comments > Is Darwinism past its 'sell-by' date? > Comments
Is Darwinism past its 'sell-by' date? : Comments
By Michael Ruse, published 13/2/2009Not one piece of Charles Darwin’s original argumentation stands untouched, unrefined. We now know much more than he did.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Page 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- ...
- 23
- 24
- 25
-
- All
I'm OK about giving Runner a bit more oxygen. He could be right.
For example, see:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=charles-darwin-confessions&print=true
" ... had not the Archbishop of Armagh, James Ussher, calculated in 1658 the Earth's age accurate to the day? Accordingly, God must have created our planet on the night preceding October 23, 4004 B.C. on the Julian calendar."
The mischief which can be had, though, when one sets an exact date, is not limited to the whims of the Bishop of Ussher and/or his(long since departed, I trust) cronies.
If creation could have happened then, if the Bishop convincingly argues that the world comes into being, something out created, of nothing (I confess, I don't know whether the Bishop was referring to the first day or the 7the day, but he has established a principle)lock, stock and Fossil Record, then there is nothing whatever to say that the univers was created 5 seconds ago, Lock Stock and Fossil Record, plus redshifted galaxies, uranium decay daughters, my email archives and this particular (and all other) internet sites and content. Not necessarily in that order of importance.
Note that I said "convincingly", not "correctly".
But runner could be right. Runner, is there a consilience of inductions you may offer, rather than just a lot of sniping at a well-accepted theory?
David F,
And it follows from your statement and the mechanisms of OE that some of us are more of the monkey and others of us are more of the mushroom. But we are all distant cousins of the broccoli. And the cockroach.
Grim,
Thank you for pointing out your website. I expect I will get back to it at some point in the future.
Runner,
If you expect me (and probably some of the other readers here) to take you seriously, you will need to cogently address the questions and replies put to you, rather than repeating the same assertions without otherwise arguing them. Naturally I would be pleased if you gave my question an articulate reply.