Chainsmoker and Ozandy pretty much said it all, but let's also keep in mind that the ACMA blacklist is completely unavailable for public review. Both the criteria for blocking sites and descriptions of the sites themselves will be completely secret. It's a ghastly and anti-democratic proposal.

Oh, and you've found us out, runner. We're against the filtering because we're atheist child-porn enthusiasts who want a bill of rights so that paedophile judges can...enforce...our...access to...

You don't actually read the things you write here, do you?

Col Rouge
I agree with you, I am against the I am against any censorship.
My english is not good enouph to write to Conroy and register my objections.
Antonios Symeonakis
Adelaide

http://www.torproject.org/

A good filter that lets one by pass the Krudd razor wire.

I’m not sure why Rudd and co didn’t just continue with Howard’s promotion of PC based internet filters. Maybe even making it law that households with minors be obliged to install such filters when they connect to the internet. It seems simple and uncontroversial.

You can keep an eye on the filter campaign or find out more about the issues at http://citizensovereignty.net/censorship.php

regards
Rosie Williams

Alternatively Getup is campaigning against the internet filter at http://www.getup.org.au/campaign/SaveTheNet/44