The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > The impossibility of atheism > Comments

The impossibility of atheism : Comments

By Peter Sellick, published 29/1/2009

The God that atheists do not believe in is not the God that Christians worship, but rather an idol of our own making or unmaking.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. Page 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. ...
  14. 48
  15. 49
  16. 50
  17. All
PtB we don't have an atheist system in Australia but a secular system. Get your facts right.
Posted by gusi, Friday, 30 January 2009 9:22:52 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
PtB, blaming the tragic death of that poor child on atheism, indicates you will steep to gutter level, in your attempt to give credence to your extreme religous belief.
Posted by Kipp, Friday, 30 January 2009 10:21:04 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
BOAZ_David,

I can always tell when you are rattled and arguing on shaky ground - you resort to childish personal abuse. And you're not even very clever at it.

Not only do you get the specific law wrong but now you show your appalling ignorance of legal history. It's hard enough to prove the facts of a matter so how would you prove intention or motive? It is the effect of a person's actions that matters, not their intention.

You get worse David. Not content just to give wrong legal advice, you now claim that a learned judge got it wrong in a specific case. Could you tell us once again what your legal qualifications are please?

Repeating an error at law will not make it become true. Calling Christianity "a Lie" is NOT 'blatant... unambiguous and clear'. It is NOT vilification.

So offering gratuitous advice to 'all would be vilifier' on how to soften the blow of truth is just compounding your nonsense. Moreover, you have given us so much hatred of Islam on OLO to last us all a lifetime - and surprise, surprise, no-one has claimed that you have breached the law. If you are consistent in your interpretation of the law, you would would have been in breach more times than I can count.
Posted by Spikey, Friday, 30 January 2009 11:05:47 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
spotbanana has nailed it.

The first comment was adequate for this article.
Posted by Houellebecq, Friday, 30 January 2009 12:56:35 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Boaz,

Sorry to dismantle your soap box, but your grasp of legal matters is extremely scanty.

The act you are quoting i.e.
“A person must not, on the ground of the religious belief or activity of another person or class of persons, engage in conduct that incites hatred against, serious contempt for, or revulsion or severe ridicule of, that other person or class of persons.”
Is there to prevent hate speech and not promote blanket censorship, and might at a stretch apply if I said all Christians were Pr*cks, but cannot be applied to censor criticism.

I believe that Christianity is a lie, but I have many good friends that are devout Christians and in spite of not sharing a faith share many values.

Peter the believer

Your attributing of the death of little Darcey to atheism is shameless and heartless, and completely without foundation. If this is an example of your Christian ethics, then the country is well shot of them.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Friday, 30 January 2009 1:25:40 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I agree with most of the arguments that suggest this article is utter nonsense, but what strikes me most is Sellick's arrogance in assuming that atheists only have no belief in the Christian God. As has been pointed out a few times, we atheists don't believe in ANY God, god, or gods (or ghosts, leprechauns, fairies...)

Mr Sellick, I'm sure you 'think' you don't believe in my Celestial Teapot, but you don't realise that the Celestial Teapot is not really the Celestial Teapot that you think it is (nor do most CelestialTeapotists, sadly, as they're uneducated). Therefore, you're not really an aCelestialTeapotist. You poor, ignorant fool!

Oh, by the way BOAZ_David... Christianity is a LIE. C'mon get me, Vic Police!
Posted by stokesonline, Friday, 30 January 2009 2:04:02 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. Page 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. ...
  14. 48
  15. 49
  16. 50
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy