The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > West weak while Palestinians pay > Comments

West weak while Palestinians pay : Comments

By Greg Barns, published 6/1/2009

Last week Barack Obama stayed on the golf course and wouldn't say boo while Palestinians were attacked by the Israelis.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All
Someone mentioned that Mr Obama is not pres yet... LOL, good point! I can't believe it... also might be worth mentioning that Hamas are a terrorist organization... and yes no one likes them.

Obviously Israelis can't just pick up and leave Israel now, even if they wanted to. It's a physically impossible and ridiculous proposal isn't it.

I would assume Palestinian supporters would hope for sane leadership, which will work for peace. Peace brokering is the best solution for Palestine as Israel is a lot stronger. Hamas need to to be voted out in favor of pro peace Palestinians. Israel only want to be left alone.

Prolonging this with support for the impossible is idealistically selfish and killing people on both sides.
Posted by meredith, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 1:43:46 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Two Pro Palestinian posts and five against, make that six if you include this one.

Sydney, regarding “its sewage running onto the streets”

No, that is just another Hamas killer trying to find a vantage point….
Posted by Col Rouge, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 1:53:52 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
GREG BARNS.... you could not hit truth if it was as bit as the broad side of your surname.

BUT WAIT.... you did come close there.. when you admitted. (was this painful?)

<<The pro-Israel lobby says Hamas is an organization that is dedicated to the destruction of Israel. True, but this only tells part of the story. >>

Err....what was that word... “TRUE” ? And that's just PART of the story?

Let's get some TRUTH here first up.

1/ NO NO NO...it is not the 'PRO ISRAEL' lobby saying that Hamas is dedicated to the destruction of Israel...it is HAMAS ITSELF...

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hamas.asp

Page 1

<<”Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it" >>

WHAT THE HECK are you people who can read this but NOT understand it?

Are you dimwits..morons.. mentally challenged.. Intellectually disabled ?

MYYYYyyyyy GOD!.. “O-B-L-I-T-E-R-A-T-E” (who does not 'get' this?)

This is not a Christmas card... it is a foundational document which defines the purpose of Nazi/Islamist/Genocidal HAMAS....who.. run Gaza and for whom the Gaza people.. VOTED.

Palestinians who voted for HAMAS share their guilt 100%

BARNS says: “The leadership of Israel is today morally and ideologically corrupt.”

What the? Why does he not say that about HAMAS? “ideologically”... “obliterate” come on Greg...put down the turps mate, or whatever ur smoking... .. it isn't helping-change your supplier..

I can only opine that Grupenfeurher Barns supports GENOCIDE.. against Jews.... has he recently joined Stormfront?
Posted by Polycarp, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 3:57:36 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Poly,

I can never grasp that either, what part of...

"Israel has no right to exist"

"We will annihilate Israel"

...does Greg and those in agreement think is OK or fair?
Posted by meredith, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 12:08:44 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Meri.... Barns and Loewenstein think differntly to normal human beings.

Here is the all time classic example.. from Loewensteins book "My Israel Question" Page 244 bottom of page:

"HAMAS HAS A HISTORY OF LAUNCHING TERROR ATTACKS AGAINS ISRAELI CIVILIANS AND A CHARTER WHICH SPECIFICALLY SEEKS THE DESTRUCTION OF ISRAEL"

Now..if he had used THAT starting point to condemn Hamas in every way possible.. it would have been appropriate.

BUT.... he then goes on to babble as follows: (top of page 245)

"but numerous hamas spokespeople have suggested that a negotiated settlement with Israel within 67 borders is possible"

he doesn't provide any reference or source for these 'numerous' Hamas spokespeople..and the only quotes I can find are those which say things like "Long term truce" + Full right of return of all refugees.

Foxy refers me to page 314 and note 62 which links to a Guardian story quoting Mashaal. In that story he says:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/jan/31/comment.israelandthepalestinians

"We shall never recognise the right of any power to rob us of our land and deny us our national rights."

and

"But if you are willing to accept the principle of a long-term truce, we are prepared to negotiate the terms."

"LONG TERM TRUCE" ? coupled with 'right of return' ?= GENOCIDE of JEWS....maybe not tomorrow..but oooh yes..it will come.

The trouble with "long term truces with Muslims" is found in the first verse of surah 9 of the Quran

9-1. Freedom from obligations (is declared) from Allâh and His Messenger to those of the Mushrikűn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh), with whom you made a treaty.

TIME IS ON ISRAEL'S SIDE...

the settler population is growing at THREE times the rate of the rest of Israel :)

...it might also be said "and so are their ideals"....

I cannot see either Hamas or the Idealistic Israelis sitting down and smoking the peace pipe in the next 1000 yrs.
Posted by Polycarp, Thursday, 8 January 2009 2:09:23 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Polycarp is happy to justify Israeli government policy and actions,by quoting the Koran.

Hundreds of women and children are getting killed ? It's OK because Polycarp can quote the Koran, regarding what he considers to be a related subject.

White Phosphorus causing horrific burns and fires in dense populated areas? Polycarp thinks it's OK because his chosen verses from the Koran justify IDF atrocities.

Israeli border guards feeling up children and old women, in case they have explosives or other contraband tucked away in their knickers? Hey, Polycarp's quotes from the the Koran make everything OK.

(see http://ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/childabuse.html)

With friends like Polycarp, the Israelis don't need enemies.

Whose side is he on, anyway?
Posted by Sir Vivor, Monday, 12 January 2009 10:03:16 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy