The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > It's the system, stupid > Comments

It's the system, stupid : Comments

By Marcus Strom, published 23/10/2008

While executive salaries are an obscenity, they are a symptom, not the cause, of the financial crisis.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All
Chris - thanks for mentioning Wallerstein... I wrote an essay - partly on Wallerstein's 'Age of Transition' - in order to cement my place in the Honours intake... Having lost the essay and notes I forgot over time the basics of his analysis... But with your having awakened my interest - I may try and find time to familarise myself with the basics again..

I agree, also, that there are democratic alternatives to neo-liberal capitalism... And definitions of 'capitalism' are numerous...

Personally, I aim to broaden the ownership of the means of prodcution so much - that there cannot be seen to be a bourgeois ruling class...

Already power is more broadly based than some Marxists suppose... (take the Weberian definition - and consider the different aspects of power, wealth etc)

A democratic mixed economy - which promotes demcoratic forms of ownership - co-operativism, Government Business Enterprises, public pension funds - can nonetheless be mixed with freedom of investment by ordinary workers.

Private investment and markets could endure - but wealth ownership and political power broadened such that citizens collectively could be seen as having sovereignty ahead of any organised economic class...

Power would increasingly be political - with economic power so broadly based...

And there would have to be a balance between responsive and innovative markets (for practical reasons, and for the sake of liberty) - and public planning...

Some forms of infrastructure, in particular, should compromse public monopoly...

Other areas - eg: banking - could be balanced amongst different democratic forms of ownership (including credit unions) - so financial/economic power is not too concentrated...)

And there are areas which would not benefit from competition - where increased cost structures of competition are dire - could comprise public monopoly...(eg: communications, welfare, transport,power and water)

Public shopping precints (including malls) - could also open up a new horizon of social life and active citizenry)

Areas such as mining - which compete internationally - could be socialised without comprising a monopoly... (in the worlds market)
Posted by Tristan Ewins, Friday, 24 October 2008 3:55:17 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy