The Forum > Article Comments > The burden of power and the challenge for Labor > Comments
The burden of power and the challenge for Labor : Comments
By Tristan Ewins, published 17/10/2008The Labor government has been handed an opportunity to break the cycle of neglect and the abuse of power of its predecessors.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
-
- All
National leaders have been elected on a platform and then have departed from it with good results. Two examples are Roosevelt promising to continue the Hoover fiscal policies and then instituting the New Deal and de Gaulle getting elected with the support of the African colons and then evacuating Algeria. However, politics is the art of the possible. If you are going to depart from your mandate you better be able to get re-elected to continue the departure.
Turnbull is the strong leader that Nelson wasn’t. I think that if Rudd tried to promote a more overtly social democratic/liberal democratic socialist party he would be out at the next election or before, and Turnbull would be Howard-lite.
Roosevelt and de Gaulle could get away with it for two reasons. They were both elected as president with fixed terms of 4 years and 7 years respectively and were both overpowering personalities. In a parliamentary system not only does the prime minister not have a fixed term, but also parliamentarians from his own party can turf him out as Bob Hawke found out.
Rudd wrote excellent essays on Dietrich Bonhoeffer. However, I think he is a better essay writer than prime minister. I don’t think he has either the political skills or the charisma to follow the examples of Roosevelt and de Gaulle.
Dear plerdsus,
Your suggestions are at cross-purposes. If you want to wean Australia off the motorcar you subsidise train and bus fares so mass transit is cheaper. To raise them is hitting the poor and those who would like to use their cars less.