The Forum > Article Comments > Is FuelWatch the best we can do? > Comments
Is FuelWatch the best we can do? : Comments
By Bernie Masters, published 19/6/2008Effective solutions to high fuel costs exist but they require strong governments willing to make difficult decisions.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
-
- All
Its interesting that the Government focus on others but not what they could achieve, for example if we removed traffic calming, which has become traffic stressing, and co-ordinated traffic lights ( I am averaging 7 red lights out of 10 in Sydney) we could improve the average speed of travel which would mean all the “existing cars” would use less fuel and produce less C02. Further road management, where the focus is on not stoping vehicles, would improve this. My car gets 7.2 litres per 100kmh on a trip but in Sydney we are getting 14.1 litres per 100kmh, off course the Government would need to spend money on infrastructure.
Also, Hyundai has produced a Hybrid LPG vehicle, which would require $10 to run for 300kmh. Korea has large supplies of LPG and has the distribution retail network just like Australia. We should be pursuing this type of technology:
http://www.autobloggreen.com/2008/06/10/hyundai-may-build-hybrid-lpg-elantra-in-australia/
Final point, once carbon trading is introduced, we will be competing with countries who do not burden there industries with dirty electricity (coal). eg France (whether you like Nuclear or not, will not have its industries burden by carbon credits like ours will). So we need to sunset our Coal powered Power Stations.