The Forum > Article Comments > We hoped for better, Kevin > Comments
We hoped for better, Kevin : Comments
By Lyn Allison, published 1/5/2008I wish I could be a more enthusiastic summiteer, but putting 1,000 'brainy' people into workshops produced very little.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
-
- All
3)FAVOURITISM?:- Personally I have no problem with 'personalities' being at the summit. We ALL have opinions from the plumber etc., to the film-star! What I DO have a problem with however, is WHETHER Jackman/Blanchett WERE 'selected' from an application, (a foregone I think)-or were they invited? IF so, why so?
And why should such people be given a prominent role simply because of who they are?
Did they or other 'prominent' people at the summit get more time to espouse THEIR ideas? Wanna bet??
To the exclusion of who?
Frankly, I'm damned if I can figure why Rudd did this. It WAS another talkfest. And it was a talkfest of the fittest and finest. It had bugger all to do with democracy, and EVERYTHING to do with 'being seen to be' democratic.
It was an expensive and ludicrous love-in for a PM who I VASTLY prefer to the self-serving bullying little twot that preceded him