The Forum > Article Comments > Tet lives on - forty years later > Comments
Tet lives on - forty years later : Comments
By John Passant, published 11/2/2008It is not often you can pinpoint the decline of a great empire. For the US it was probably forty years ago.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Page 9
- 10
- 11
-
- All
”So, were you trying to tell us you were a socialist at the age of 18? I would have to say that it would be quite difficult for some of us to imagine.”
At age 18 I had just done a year at art college, but decided I did not want to spend the rest of my life impoverished.
My politics were still forming and largely influenced by my parents values. I considered the merits of socialism and could see it might support me, better than the risky hurly-burly of capitalism.
Maybe I was a late developer but it was after my first few economics lectures, when studying to be an accountant, that I could see why socialism does not and never will work to the benefit of anyone.
Everything since those days has merely confirmed how correct my analysis has been.
Nothing which socialism (or any of its malformed derivatives) attempts has bettered what a libertarian capitalist system has delivered, in terms, not simply of economic opportunity but in the quality of life of the individuals embraced by the system.
I do endeavour to focus on the holistic effect of political philosopies and not just the "material". Thus "life quality" embraces more than simply everyone having somewhere nice to live.
Whilst I recognize that not everyone under capitalist libertarianism achieves great things or wealth and some fall into poverty; socialism, despite the promises and rhetoric, fails to prevent poverty but also demands to minimise the reward for personal effort.
I would also say that whilst the libertarian / capitalist system has not always been able to prevented famine, at least it has not deployed famine and starvation for its political ends, as is the case for various socialist / communist governments.
Those are some of the good reasons for me being what many might call “right of centre”.
I apologize to no one for thinking that way or promoting those values in the face of the socialist credo of small-minded envy, faux-compassion and arbitrarily enforced leveling.