"The who has sex with whom thing is totally irrelevant because noone is calling for homosexuality to be outlawed. "

You've lost me J Bennett. So what's this debate about and why do you call them "homos?"

Does anyone call you a "heter" J Bennett?

Many kids are now being raised by a sole heterosexual male.

In gay marriages, there will be two males to share the burden and statistics so far reveal that children raised by gays are well adjusted and do not become gay.

J Bennett: " Homos just keep trying to shut people up from telling the truth by calling anyone who disagrees with them homophobic and writing off any opposition as religious nutters or accusing them of being interested in what homos do in the bedroom. If that dishonesty works their wrongs will be considered rights by the law even if thinking members of the public know it is wrong."

On the basis of his persistent hateful bleating on this subject, it's pretty clear to thinking members of the public that J Bennett is a classic homophobe. His opinions on homosexual relationships can therefore best be ignored, since they are the product of psychopathology rather than reason.

Reading through your postings J.Bennett, it would appear you have issues in your life that you have not dealt with.

You responded to me " However if you got cured get married and get everything you want".

What sort of comment is that other than an indication, of a person who is living a very unhappy life, who accordingly takes their fustration out on others, out of envy!

J.Bennett. Live your life and respect others, then your life may be better and happy!

"noone is calling for homosexuality to be outlawed."

”So what's this debate about and why do you call them "homos?"

Does anyone call you a "heter" J Bennett?”

Dickie the thread is about a marriage like thing for homos and of course associated issues but I don’t believe anyone has extended it as far as calling for homosexuality to be outlawed. Hetero is the equivalent abbreviation for heterosexual but I don’t know what homos call us?

”J Bennett is a classic homophobe. His opinions on homosexual relationships can therefore best be ignored"

CE Morgan trust an "enthusiastic" analphillic hetero to be the first to latch onto the word in response.

Seriously you say that to take the piss out of me but some homos would say exactly that with a straight face and some heteros are stupid enough to take it seriously.

Gay marriage is ugly enough for kids but is anyone game to face the issue that homos next step after marriage/adoption may be to change the catch cry from consenting adult to consenting person including children? Sure no mainstream activist will own up to it but they used to deny they would seek gay marriage.

Kipp "You responded to me " However if you got cured get married and get everything you want"."

What sort of comment is that other than an indication, of a person who is living a very unhappy life, who accordingly takes their fustration out on others, out of envy!

I don't completely understand the only frustration I took out on you in the comment was my concern about your well being and "takes their frustration out" is a queer way of expressing that. You are right that there is some envy because fools consider homos like sacred cows but it is limited because I know of your problems.

"J.Bennett. Live your life and respect others, then your life may be better and happy!"

Thank you for taking out your frustration on me but I am fine. There are some people present company not included as yet who I find it hard to respect.

"Gay marriage is ugly enough for kids but is anyone game to face the issue that homos next step after marriage/adoption may be to change the catch cry from consenting adult to consenting person including children?"

Uh, ok, I'm game. That's a ridiculous assertion for which you have no proof. Australia is united in believing children cannot consent to sex - it's one of our most stable laws. The worldwide trend is the other way - countries where the age of consent was once what we in the west consider too young are increasingly raising that age. In Australian, no lobby group is attempting to change the age of consent. I have never met or heard of a gay person who is in the least bit interested in changing the age of consent.

Gay people aren't attracted to children. They're attracted to people of their own sex. Pedeophiles are attracted to children.

If you're suggesting that adults may attempt to make having sex with children legal in order to abuse them, then statistically this call is more likely to come from heterosexual men. (Not that I in any way believe that it will.) Children who are abused are most likely to be abused by a heterosexual relative or friend of the family. More girls than boys are abused, but even adult male sexual abusers of boys often do not believe they are gay.

If you have some proof for your assertion, let's have a look at it. If not, it seems to me paranoid and not really worth debating.

Okay here is some proof but be clear that I am not trying to completely get away from the issue of perverts bringing up children as being a problem by itself but am just raising an additional concern with the molestation.

There is good grounds for suspicion and no chances should be taken with kids safety. Homos are already perverts with a similar condition to paedophiles, people often have more than one mental illness so why not similar ones, and the only people who know for sure are homos and they don't have a good history of being honest about their agenda.

Of course something always leaks out (although lucky I checked it today as it wasn't working and I needed to get it from archive). Here is a link from an honest homo in America who names a bunch of politicians with similar views and it is obvious from his writing that he knows others of his persuasion agree with him. If they all disagreed why would he bother with the website?

http://web.archive.org/web/20070710185136/http://www.actwin.com/eatonohio/gay/ophocounton.html