No Politician or Parliament has any authority to prevent or restrict any individual from attempting to seek a remedy by way of a JUDICIAL-PROCEEDING conducted in a properly constituted court, for the harm caused by some tort or wrong committed as this is enshrined in our Westminster system of Government whether the politicians like it or not.
If a person is required to defend a claim for damages and the result could be that it will cost the defendant a considerable amount of their property or money, any order of the court is an exercise of judicial power that is executed without the express consent of the defendant and it can not be made in any other dispute resolution process without their consent other than a Court exercising the judicial Power of the Commonwealth as your right to property is a right provided by Aust Constitution.
What they have attempted to do is to provide an alternative dispute-resolution-process, a LEGAL-PROCEEDING, that is unable to be identified by the victims who rely totally on the thieving members of the legal-profession who have no real regard for the victim as their primary concern is how much money they can suck out of the victims for allegedly re-presenting him in the dispute resolution process that is not a Chapter 3 Court as required by the Australian Constitution.
One only has to read the Qld Vexatious Litigants Act to identify this LEGAL-PROCEEDINGS scamm attempted by the Parliaments and condoned by the not so honourable members of the judiciary and the members of the legal profession who are just conducting the business of the so called courts.
The reason the various Governments have attempted to restrict the litigation is to protect the very people who are agents of the State and Commonwealth who every day engage in offensive conduct for the benefit of these governing corporations. How many examples do I have to identify, immigration detention, the Indian Doctor and the thousands of suicides of the non-custodial-parents caused by the CSA unlawfully accessing their Tax File numbers in the best interests of fatherless children.