Crime Prevention ? Who gets what protection and why Australia?

Crime prevention is a term describing techniques used for reducing victimization, to deter and reduce crime.

Howard's spent millions and millions of public well earned coins on propaganda. Through television, newspapers and direct junk mail.

This government ignores all calls for more to be spent to protect civilians from systematic crime.

Howards government pays others to bash unions. Points fingers, naming blaming, shaming, unjustly smearing Australia's National politics.

Public servants are paid to act as savage dogs hunting, sniffing, snaring teeth out on an enemies blood. The efforts spent cravenness, mission? To mule its prey.

A same federal party that detains, defames a foreign doctor, misusing our nations governance laws. A media bliz, serving its own-sake, mirrored historical. This act is pretensive, a characterized unconscionable maleness working, a structurally abusive power?

Violated is good Federal governance. Our principles of community justice, tilted conveniently, a reduced schoolyard, the person then locked into the scandalous . The burden on proof.

This costs the taxpayer. All livelihood ignored. As Liberals aim the targets, victimizing in cowardice, reproducing more chains of waste and uncalulated pain.

Be it the funds spent for anti-terror adds, or those used underhand ineradicable. These Liberals are unbridled, misusing sovereign powers.

Does it have our permission to wage us all into some kind of repression, tame us with this projective form of cold civic game?

If only Howards Team needs a focus on real crime prevention rather than terror.

Give us, the community the same access you give your dog like investigators, to uncover the structually based, community crimes.

Who is Ms Elsie Phillips (Alias) Mr Howard? . Is she not the same, who clones the methods of media, to sway cause for the public's eye to cause a dysfunction? (see miacat post above)

Why did your government not spent the dollars to investigate her?

And what about those behind Centerlink. Those nameless ones slackened behind the call centre's, who blacklist or refuse to transfer the equitable rights of citizens.

The justice hushed is a productive administration blind.

http://www.miacat.com
.

Which brings me to my next point.

Dont do drugs.

Look if you want to sit up in Cooktown on the dole defending a bloody terrorist and dribbling on about god knows what then thats your perogative however.

Regional development north of the coal fields has been pretty grim for years. Roads and infrastructure in the north is a bloody joke as anyone who has driven a truck to Weipa will attest to.

We are second class citizens up here and should by rights have our own state with the capital in Coen so the pollies understand everytime they drive home how bad the roads are.

if Charlie Mac Killop loses in Leichhardt, it won’t be because of her gender or sexual orientation, but because she failed to negotiate the intricate process of convincing the seat that she has what it takes as a politician to represent them.

Not quite correct as the Liberal Party candidate was involved in some very smelly conduct with Mr Stench in order to get preselected and a good majority of the members of the local Liberal Party will not be voting for her and many have resigned in protest. It would appear that her time in Ruddocks office had more to do with why she was to be the person who shall be preselected at what ever cost.
If she gets elected she will end up a smelly as Stenchy as he had worn out his welcome long ago and was lucky to survive the Petition commenced in the High Court that had his election in the last Federal election put to the test in the private hearing conducted by one of the not so honourable justices, who was actually appointed a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia, in his own private court sitting in persona designata jurisdiction.
The decisions and orders made in this sham Tribunal by the referee, who cloaked his work in the neutral colours of a judicial action in the Federal Court of Australia with the IMPLIED CONSENT of the Petitioner, did not have to be obeyed and have no legal force or effect and the show trial was conducted at the expense of Stenchy, who could not even defend himself as he had no defence, as no costs have been paid, as directed by Mr John Alfred DOWSETT, by the Petitioner who is now standing as an independent just to rub salt into the $15,000.00 wound.