The Forum > Article Comments > An Australian head of state > Comments
An Australian head of state : Comments
By John Warhurst, published 9/11/2007The republic issue should be on the agenda because this election is a contest about Australia’s future.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Page 10
-
- All
Posted by Mr Gerrit H Schorel-Hlavka, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 2:34:06 AM
|
Currently the Federal Government only can deal with legal matters for which they were given powers. Obviously they are pushing to be independent so they can get more power! If there was no “power” reward for them they would not push for it.
Every time the politicians seeks something you can bet your bottom dollar it is to rob us from our rights!
.
The Commonwealth of Australia is not a dominion, kingdom, empire or a state but merely a “POLITICAL UNION” between the States.
.
See also my blog; http://au.360.yahoo.com/profile-ijpxwMQ4dbXm0BMADq1lv8AYHknTV_QH .
As I always state; “We either have a constitution or we don’t.” As such, “We either have the rule of law or we don’t.”.
As a “CONSTITUTIONALIST” I see no validity in the Australian Act 1986 or other garbage they are trying to shove down our throats.
The moment you accept the nonsense they give you then you have caved in to be robbed of your constitutional rights and you have accepted DICTATORSHIP.
I may not be impressed with the British royals but constitutionally they are the Crown and if we don’t like it then it is for the “people” to change it and not that politicians/judges bit by bit are robbing us of our constitutional rights without we having any say in it.
Again, read my blog!