The Forum > Article Comments > Privileged 'whites' > Comments
Privileged 'whites' : Comments
By Jennifer Clarke, published 8/10/2007Australia’s migration and citizenship laws privilege ‘whites’ in all sorts of ways.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Page 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- ...
- 43
- 44
- 45
-
- All
Yes, there are times and places with extensive poverty and little crime - I'd guess this is because the poverty was/is widely shared, and everyone felt/feels like they're all in it together (stories from the Great Depression seem to confirm this).
I don't doubt that much of the crime among black populations is due to a "sub-culture" that has developed among them where violence is glorified. Multi-culturalism does not mean accepting all aspects of other cultures: some are clearly incompatible or undesirable. But, again, where is the evidence that blacks are inherently more likely to develop such a sub-culture? Has someone actually seriously studied the genetic make-up of blacks and said well, look, here is this correlation between genes A, B and C and behaviours X, Y, and Z?
And if it is there, then isn't the best solution to find ways to ensure such a sub-culture doesn't take root? (something that's not likely to be successful if its white governments imposing such changes, while blacks see whites as an oppressive enemy). I understand anti-ghetto laws have been tried in France, not sure how successful they've been.
BTW which criminologists have rejected the poverty-crime link? I agree it's simplistic and insufficient to explain all crime, and in many cases it's likely that crime causes poverty, leading to a vicious circle. My suspicion is that there are significant genetic traits that cause some people to be more likely to choose crime than others, but as long as people have a decent standard of living, those genetic tendencies can be relatively easily suppressed.