The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > How sick is our health system? > Comments

How sick is our health system? : Comments

By Ian McAuley, published 11/10/2007

In Australia we have a number of loosely connected health programs. But it’s too much of a mess to be dignified by calling it a 'health system'.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All
We need to be honest when assessing our health system, by looking at the underlying causes for the conditions being treated by our health system. This means judging our own society and the affects it has on individuals. Behind a lot of our behaviour which ends in affecting our health are abnormal though popular ways of coping with the stresses in our society,(drinking, being busy, smoking, shopping, eating, extreme exercise, competition, many addictions). Our society is not that good in lots of ways, especially the mania of workplaces and the pressure to get more and compete with each other. None of this encourages a healthy society, but we are stuck in it and it is getting worse, and the health service is expected to pick up the pieces from a dysfunctional society.
Posted by jillham, Sunday, 14 October 2007 6:33:45 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
jillham,

When a Pych. student back in he 70s, one lecturer could not receive funding for a study into the prevention of alcoholism. He was told the money was there if the people to study were already alcoholics. Perhaps, little has changed
Posted by Oliver, Monday, 15 October 2007 10:23:50 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Two letters to today's SMH are typical of many others:

http://www.smh.com.au/letters/index.html?page=3
Posted by Oliver, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 12:39:20 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
ABBOTT BREAKS PROMISE TO PORK BARREL FOR ELECTION

"The outlook for recovery from rectal cancer is unique for each individual. Many factors are involved, when considering the chance of survival after rectal cancer treatment.

Long-term survival generally depends upon the stage of the cancer at the time of diagnosis and treatment.

According to stage, the following approximations of the likelihood of survival 5 years after treatment are as follows:

Stage I: The probability of being alive in 5 years is approximately 70-80%. Stage II: The probability of being alive in 5 years is approximately 50-60%. Stage III: The probability of being alive in 5 years is approximately 30-40%. Stage IV: The probability of being alive in 5 years is less than 10%."

--- WedMD

http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2007/s1973995.htm

http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2007/s2043989.htm

Abbot did not keep his promises. Also, I understand that attempts at leveragw through Catholic Cardinal George Peel failed, appreciating this a matter of life and death, rather church and state.
Posted by Oliver, Friday, 26 October 2007 5:01:20 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy