The Forum > Article Comments > Privacy is a First World fancy > Comments
Privacy is a First World fancy : Comments
By Mirko Bagaric, published 31/8/2007If footballers want to party with party drugs that's their business and that of the criminal law. Their over-zealous employer has no role in monitoring activities.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
-
- All
Posted by sneekeepete, Monday, 3 September 2007 5:21:47 PM
|
Still he has point to put - and doesnt he put it EVERWHERE HE CAN - DAY IN DAY OUT - ?
But back to the issue of privacy - he has a point - privacy is an artifical construct - a man made idea and we are all a bit too precious about it - still I like my privacy and that is enough for me to want to protect it - Chanel 7 might run the public interest line but I tihnk they often confuse public with prurient - ( and yes to all the pedants I know it refers to mainly matter sexual as a rule but you get my point )
As for the Footballers - I am wearied by all this - if the consumption of what ever it is they took did not effect their on field performance AND the drugs were not considered performance enhancing - SO what -
the AFL has adopted an Employee Assisitance Policy/program - probably like one that exists in the very public service J Howard and P Costello administer - so they need to shut up for a start. Give up this nonsense about 'Sending the wwrong message" - no one reeeeeally cares
There are thousands of Australians attending GPs for help with substance abuse - no one is calling for them to be handed over to the police for questioning - like so many concerned citizens seem to want regarding the footballers
Even bloody Neil Mitchel has trotted out the "what about the Kids" garbage - this is a non event and merely firms up my opinion that waht passes for journalism in this country is little more than gossip - particualrly in the sports area
the medical records were it seems stolen - Channel 7 has been implicated in recieving stolen goods - that is the story - that is of public interest - the rest is a sideshow.