Why would anyone use children being sexually abused for political gain?

It isn't Howard doing this, as like the Tampa - it's the left.

This is occuring as the shameless left don't see non-whites as human, just Aboriginals - stuck in their little cultural package for all eternity, to be looked at like some sort of zoo creature.

Leftists experience multiculturalism when they go to a restaurant on a Friday night, although when they get food poisioning, they choose not to see that as cultural.

For some at a party the other night in Melbourne, where thirty 'youths' crashed it - stabbing people with swords(read racist Asians) multiculturalism is a nightmare.

I have no doubt that the left will be seen as the Nazi's of our time.

Leaders like Noel Pearson are already starting to see this. I hope that makes some of you leftist racists tremble!

Pearson goes wrong by thinking the left has goodwill, that their 'socialist' attitudes towards Aborginies - which he rightly blames for the mess, weren't intentional.

Cowards who would rather walk over a bridge and sign a 'sorry' book than demand safety for abused kids away from their tribal value system don't have goodwill.

They are nothing but middle-class leftist white bigots.

Only last year a case in the NT displayed the cultural values that some tribes live under, when a paedophile who raped a girl used the defence that it was his culture, that he committed no crime as he 'owned' her.

Great value system! I can see why the Muslim bigot Keysar Trad sees Aboriginal culture akin to Islamic values!

Yet this is the madness leftists want to preserve, seeing it as cultural genocide if we get rid of it.

It is racist to say that Aboriginies should live that way because they always have.

It's interesting leftists hold this opinion given they are screaming for us to accept refugees fleeing non-western cultural values!

Bizarre contradiction.

Sharkfin,

It is insane that many think only whites can be racist, and this is in fact proof that those who think that way are racist.

Why?

Because they think white people are so far above others that a white can't be the victim of racism.

This despite racial bashings, racially motivated pack rapes of 'Aussie sluts' by middle-eastern Anglophobes.

The Sunni/Shiite massacres are partly based on race.

The Arab Muslim Janjaweed gangs pack-raping black women before they slit their throats is racism.

The murder of ethnic minorities all over the Islamic world is racism.

In fact, only white countries have laws that state all of it's citizens are equal.

In places like Iran, even Japan, ethnic minorities can't hold certain jobs, buy land, and so on.

Probably the worst racism in the middle-east is against Israel, and Palestinians.

While Muslims openly on every channel preach the genocide of Israeli's, Islamic countries keep Palestinian refugees in camps, not allowing them to integrate as citizens, buy land, work in the cities, and so on.

They have been in such camps for over fifty years, and are only still alive because the west funds the camps.

Ethnic youth form gangs based on ethnicity is an example of racism.

That Muslims didn't sack Hilali or protest shows the vast majority are racist.

Arranged marriages are racism.

When geneticists look at races they notice that Europeans have mixed the most - which is why we have different coloured hair, eyes, skin types, and so on.

It is those who only marry their own tribe that are racist.

In this regard, Lebanese Muslims top the chart according to a study done through Monash University by Professor Bob Birrell.

Don't ever let people tell you only whites are racist.

Whites are the only who aren't!

Our countries are multicultural, we allow non-whites to hold any job, although none join the SES, police, fire brigade - again, because they are racist.

HRS

I was curious to learn that one of your children has "¼ aboriginal blood". Are you sure the tests were done accurately? There's nothing so dangerous as miscegenation.

I know it's not for me to interfere with what I'm sure is an otherwise wonderful family, but I was just wondering whether a blood transfusion might help. You could choose, perhaps to go all the way with white blood - there's a bit of it about. Or, you could go the other way and give the child a complete tankfull of Indigenous blood.

But you wouldn't want your child to be like a "negro" would you, so you'd only choose white blood, eh?

But another tip, HRS. Marry the child off quick and get it a job real quick. As you say:
"What was found in the US was that low rates of employment combined with low rates of marriage created a whole range of social problems."

And I think you hit a big nail right on the head with that stuff about repeated use of the term “women and children” in the HREOC article. As you say, it's feminist and sexist because "it alienates aboriginal men in those communities and is likely to overlook the real problems occurring in those communities".

So there's another great solution, HRS. Don't mention those ugly feminists words "women and children" in any future report. Even if it's about w and c, I'm sure we can get HREOC to find a way of disguising that.

Nice to talk to you HRS. I'll talk to you again next full moon.

Sharkfin, i was wonder who would pop up (again) to put forward that old favourite.

While you cant claim Blacks practice in the same form as you do and continue to do so the facts are that the end result is quite different.

As you are reading this you are standing on stolen land, land that was stolen on the basis and justification of white racism.

Racism is about power and privilidge.

I know you don't want to believe what I've just said and have more power than my to decide this than i have.

So to end this little dialogue, yes acts of racism can happen both ways and they do. But the significant difference is the end result.

Ie, you are simply a product of your own ignorance about your own white privilidge! You don't have to think about what it means to be white everyday and thats what white priviledge - having the power to determine what is and what is not racist.

Get it?

Sharkfin, i was wonder who would pop up (again) to put forward that old favourite.

While you cant claim Blacks practice in the same form as you do and continue to do so the facts are that the end result is quite different.

As you are reading this you are standing on stolen land, land that was stolen on the basis and justification of white racism.

Racism is about power and privilidge.

I know you don't want to believe what I've just said and have more power than my to decide this than i have.

So to end this little dialogue, yes acts of racism can happen both ways and they do. But the significant difference is the end result.

Ie, you are simply a product of your own ignorance about your own white privilidge! You don't have to think about what it means to be white everyday and thats what white priviledge IS - having the power to determine what is and what is not racist.

Get it?

When I was in the US for a few months a while ago I was alarmed to realise that people filling in all sorts of forms had to state their 'race'. Why should any government be allowed to request this sort of information? How does one define one's own race?

I remember, as a politically aware person growing up in Australia in the middle of last century, that no one seemed to know what race our family belonged to. Then someone suggested 'Caucasian' which I thought this was strange, as I'd never heard that term before.

In fact, I've never been asked what race I belong to, and for that I'm glad to be Australian.

Having to declare one's race should be made illegal in every country in the world.