The Forum > Article Comments > When poverty means not having enough to eat > Comments
When poverty means not having enough to eat : Comments
By Sally Babbington, Sue King and Christine Ratnasingham, published 30/4/2007The debate about poverty definitions and measurement needs to be grounded in the actual experiences of people who are going without.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
-
- All
Social Inclusion is CIVIC business.
10 Points (meinmuk!) to (ALL) those who are trying to understand the dynamic's of 'Mitigating poverty' and the importance of civic wellbeing.
Here's to to YOU Ms Gilard, I hear every word you say!
http://www.bsl.org.au/main.asp?PageId=5054
and to South Australia for some well timed innovative inspiration.
http://www.socialinclusion.sa.gov.au/page.php?id=8
I vote on Work and Family... which is the most practical way to value children as we work to solve the “crisis” in childcare, help connect communities, and return to a 'quality way of life'.
"http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/07/18/1982104.htm
These are REAL ECONOMIC STEPS to an ALL of AUSTRALIAN 2007 FEDERAL ELECTION APPROACH.
The long-term cost savings on Health alone will be plus for our whole national community.
It is GOOD POLICIES like this that will help inspirit the difference.
http://www.miacat.com/
.