The Forum > Article Comments > South Africa no longer deserves to host 2010 World Cup > Comments
South Africa no longer deserves to host 2010 World Cup : Comments
By Peter Roebuck, published 20/4/2007It is inconceivable that a prestigious football event can be held in a country that holds hands with the wickedness of President Mugabe
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
-
- All
You talk as if you know more about SA than anyone here. But in all you’ve said, your position is not clear (unless I’ve missed it). Should South Africa host the 2010 World Cup or not?
You say you don’t like religion getting mixed up in politics. Is it okay to mix sport and politics?
You say that South Africa is such as terrible place. I suppose that means you think they don’t deserve a premier sporting event. But what if hosting the tournament just helps the economy a little? Or maybe they deserve any help.
You ask whether any of the people commenting here have ever been to South Africa. Well, I was born there, but I haven’t visited in quite a while. Let’s assume that that disqualifies me and all the other Australians who are wanting to comment on this Australian based website. Hoe de donner werk dit?
So I turn to my South African friend who is just visiting here at the moment, and ask his opinion on Peter Roebuck’s idea to take away their World Cup. He furrows his eyebrows, scratches his head, and says, “I am no fan of Mbeki’s Zimbabwe policy, but that just doesn’t make any sense. Peter Roebuck has always had some funny ideas”.