The Forum > Article Comments > The alliance is not the issue, it's about Iraq > Comments
The alliance is not the issue, it's about Iraq : Comments
By John Roskam, published 21/2/2007To maintain support for US and Australian troops in Iraq, George Bush and John Howard can no longer rely on the argument that 'we can't afford to lose'.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
-
- All
The Yanks and Little Johnny won't admit that they have already lost the war. These are tribal people we are dealing with and democracy is not part of their culture. If it was, their leaders would accept concensus and compromise, but this will not happen. Power is what it is all about.
The best thing that should happen, is to go back to the three main Shi'ite, Sunni, and Kurd areas and let each area sort out what they want. There is going to be more bloodshed, whichever way it happens, but at least, there will be less lives lost in total as is happening while this civil war lasts.
It would appear that both the British and Australian troops have played a more successful role in stabilising the areas under their control. Perhaps this is because they do not use the "Brute force and ignorance" methods of the Yanks.
The proportionately lower casualty rate amongst our troops seems to bear witness to that, so from a strategic point of view, it might be better if the Yanks all went home and we sent a few more of ours over to show them how it should be done. (I am only half serious here)