The Forum > Article Comments > Double standards over diversity > Comments
Double standards over diversity : Comments
By Paul Frijters and Tony Beatton, published 19/2/2007There is a deplorable tendency among social scientists to blunt their critical rigour.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
-
- All
Ernst Gellner (no Marxist, he) made a fairly sound case to show that the founding of modern nation-states depends upon the erasure of localised village/provincial differences into an homogenised national identity that spans considerable geographic distance.
This is how the national identities of England, France, Germany, Russia, China, Japan, US, and all the great nations were formed.
To anybody for whom nation-states represent the sine qua non of human society, the pinnacle of human organisation beyond which we cannot progress, then diversity is to be regarded with suspicion and anxiety, since diversity attempts to reassert the simple humanistic liberal values of individual difference.
But for anybody who thinks that monolithic compulsory identification with a nation-state leads to, as George Orwell put it, a "boot stamping on human face, forever", then diversity, the assertion of individual will and preferences, has its attractions...