The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > What is right and what is wrong? > Comments

What is right and what is wrong? : Comments

By Graham Preston, published 1/2/2007

Book review: 'Right and wrong - how to decide for yourself' by Hugh Mackay.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All
>>I find it somewhat bizarre when people defend logical contradictions.<<

Grey, your definition of a logical contradiction presumably includes those Christians who observe the commandment "thou shalt not kill" by joining the army and blowing people up?

How much more "morally relative" can you get?
Posted by Pericles, Friday, 2 February 2007 5:01:37 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Graham Prestons literature review was flawed because to assert McLeay’s work is flawed requires reason rather than just say so. It could be accidental on Prestons part or it may be due to lack of interest on the subject or some loaded agenda. Who knows?

To address the issue raised about self determined morality we only have to look at ourselves and our neighbours. As a godless person I have never stolen, never killed, never cheated. An extraordinary number of Christians kill, cheat, steal; backstab ect while at the same time claiming moral superiority. Proof complete that morality is anthropogenic and in most cases individual constructs.

If morality was absolute that makes God or Allah immoral according to their deeds in scripture. Hell itself is immoral. Jesus demonstrated very bad values through his exclusionism and his preaching that those who were not of his superstition would be eternally tortured. Again God is not proven , it is claimed on the basis of made up knowledge so is a superstitious tool of deception so the concept of god is immoral.

No real god to speak of then morality belongs to man and man only and his invention.

The historical adage of morality is treating others the way you would like to be treated (No Christians, Jesus did not invent this). Good is what has a positive or at worst benign effect on people and their lives. Bad is what has a negative effect on people. Evil is the bad with complete lack or empathy for others. Primates are hardwired through evolution to be social animals and social cohesion is the characteristic which has made many primate species successful. From Baboons and Gibbons to Humans we share what we may describe as a trait for common good. Nature through evolution throws in doomed genes in which we will be confronted by a certain percentage of what we call evil which society will eject and in the wild at least snuff out that line.
Posted by West, Saturday, 3 February 2007 6:45:36 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy