The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Education - a passport from poverty > Comments

Education - a passport from poverty : Comments

By Stephen Hagan, published 14/9/2006

Getting a decent education is the best hope for Indigenous Australians.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All
Same old same old. Aborigines need ‘incentives’ to better themselves and more money. As if a better life is not enough incentive for them to seek education.

More money for ABSTUDY without means testing means further expansion of the handout mentality, which typifies the relationship between indigenous Australians and the rest of us.

The rest of Mr. Hagan’s article is also more of the same: talking about himself, and insulting the dreadful white man.

What a bore!
Posted by Leigh, Thursday, 14 September 2006 9:01:41 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Why Traditional Education Is Not THE Solution

Let's be precise: traditional, formal, individual education is not THE solution for disadvantaged communities.

Formal, individual education can and does improve fate of individuals.

But if applied alone, it would have only limited positive and even some detrimental impact on communities.

The critical feature of traditional, formal path of education and socio-economic progress is that those people from disadvantaged groups, which were able to gain education, are not able to find use for their skill in the community, nor motivation to do it.

As the result, the brightest and most entrepreneurial individuals are leaving their communities further draining their limited pool of skills and talents.

It does not mean that formal education should be abandoned. Not at all. But it needs to be coupled with community-based economic development programs.

For example, there are ten aboriginal kids from Cairns area with interest in architecture.

Traditionaly, he (or she) goes to study to Brisbane finishes uni and looks for a job.

Most likely eight out of ten would not be able to go and study. Only one of two would suceed and would become architects.

Where? In Sydney or Brisbane.

Result: 9 kids frustrated, hating the world and likely to go into perpetuating cycle of substance abuse, poverty and crime.

If, however, we create also a community based construction project for the Cairns area the story may be different.

Now, the eight kids could start with intermediary jobs: being carpenters, plumbers and draftsman. Some of them would continue education and progress later.

Out of our two uni students the drop-out can work on the community project and come back to uni after a year or two of work.

The 'successful' kid might come too back and work with the community...

This way we would have
a) four kids – architects and six trades people
b) a very different community attitude. Instead of jealousy and suspicion of looking down at the community we would have appreciation, and cooperation…
c) tangible benefits within the community
d) much wider availability of role models...

Paul
www.creativewinwin.com
Posted by Paul_of_Melb, Thursday, 14 September 2006 12:00:35 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Well said. Domestic violence is certainly not isolated to indigenouc communities. Child abuse is is certainly not isolated to indigenouc communities. Yet Howard the "dog whistler" uses every opportunity to reinforce racial stereotypes and implies that it is.

More of the good news from indigenous communities (and there is a lot of it) would be useful to redress the balance. Don't expect it to come from the Murdoch press or the shock jocks of course or most of the right wing dominated media in Australia.
Posted by AMSADL, Thursday, 14 September 2006 1:30:51 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I have often been struck by the common proposition that people with low pay/status jobs all have the potential to improve their lot with increased effort, particularly in the areas of education and retraining. This implies that their current circumstance, and intrinsic low level of reward, is deserved because it is due to their lack of effort.

This ignores a fundamental fact in the structure of our society and that is that our society is specialized into different work tasks. If our society needs 3% of workers to be cab drivers then 3% of workers will be cab drivers. If it requires 4% of workers to be cleaners then 4% will be cleaners. If it requires 1% to be doctors then 1% will be doctors and so on. It is simply not possible for everyone to be doctors, lawyers, employers, etc. Everyone cannot be in the top layers of the pyramid no matter how much effort, training, education, etc is applied. All that can happen is that we will have more 'architects driving cabs' than we have now, I know a woman with a PhD in Ethics who works as a telemarketeer – this makes for more dissatisfaction not less.

The only way to truly improve the lot of people with low pay/status jobs is to improve the pay/status of those jobs because in this specialized type of society those jobs; cleaners, process workers, labourers, etc will always be there and in more or less stable numbers
Posted by Rob513264, Friday, 15 September 2006 2:23:40 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Rob wrote:
> This ignores a fundamental fact in the structure of our society and that is that our society is specialized into different work tasks. If our society needs 3% of workers to be cab drivers then 3% of workers will be cab drivers. If it requires 4% of workers to be cleaners then 4% will be cleaners.

this is true only to some extent:
a) society does not need 10 or 15% unemployed,
b) with creativity we can change clearners' jobs to cleaning machinery operators and reduce % of cleanres from 4% to 2%;
your Ph.D. friend (I know) such as weel may come-up with a good business idea and create -for instance a multilingual day-care centre and become an owner/manager...

there are limits, but the cake can be made bigger as well...

Paul

www.creativewinwin.com
Posted by Paul_of_Melb, Friday, 15 September 2006 2:49:25 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Ah yes, Rob513264, but our society needs to believe that the disadvantaged are there only due to their own <insert blame factor x here>, and not because of any structural or systemic factors beyond their control or, heaven help us, to which we ourselves contribute.

Granted, there are many things all of us can do to improve our lot in life. Granted, many people's lifestyle reflects choices they have made.

But it's just too disturbing for some to understand that, in many cases, it wouldn't matter how hard people try, or how much effort they put in, many of us have to run at 100%, just to stand still. For that would challenge the myth about the fair go egalitarian Australia we keep hearing so much about, and which so many hold as an article of faith.

And don't they just repond with venom if you dare to suggest that maybe it ain't so.

Much easier to simply mouth off some platitudes about "personal responsibility" and "why don't they get a job", and then go back to smug, self-satisfied sleep.
Posted by Mercurius, Friday, 15 September 2006 4:47:55 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I know you guys just loe the wanky b-s, but the best way for an aboriginal person to get ahead is to get away from other aborigines.
Posted by citizen, Friday, 15 September 2006 7:26:11 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Thank you citizen for proving my point.
Posted by Mercurius, Friday, 15 September 2006 7:44:23 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
) with creativity we can change clearners' jobs to cleaning machinery operators and reduce % of cleanres from 4% to 2%;Posted by Paul_of_Melb, Friday, 15 September 2006 2:49:25 PM

Wow, so you are a professional spin-doctor eh? Perhaps you can clarify something for me - can spin-doctors believe their own spin?

Cleaners already are 'cleaning machinery operators' but they still get cleaners' pay and cleaners' social status. The creativity is all fluff in your own mind - try working as a 'cleaning machinery operator' for a while - you will get the picture.
Posted by Rob513264, Saturday, 16 September 2006 2:10:46 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Rob,
there is a beautiful prayer
"Lord, grant me courage to change things I can change,
grant me serenity to accept things I can not change
and wisdom to tell one from the other"

................
and the is another:
"seek, and you shall find"

I am no Christian fanatic, but this are good quotations -
we can do something
if
we are looking for opportunites to do so.

all the best to you

Paul
Posted by Paul_of_Melb, Sunday, 17 September 2006 12:33:09 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
During the early Qing (1644-1912), Kangxi 1678) had to deal with problem of old loyalities to the Ming. What he did was to identify the fifty --grew to 143, I think-- most gifted Han (under occupation) and fast-tracked them through the Chinse examination system to key administrative posts. While it didn't work as well as anticipated, it might provide a base model.
Posted by Oliver, Monday, 18 September 2006 11:56:54 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
All the plans and schemes dealing with education, employment etc. will fail. The essential problem for white and black Australia is spiritual.

What use is an education policy, however good in the face of statistics such as those released by the Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) about suicide rates in the Northern Territory.

"New figures released today are the first to confirm that the territory has bucked national trends with a suicide rate that increased rapidly between 1981 and 2002.
Rates among indigenous men skyrocketed by 800 per cent, with those aged under 45 most at risk, but non-indigenous men were also vulnerable." from an article about the MJA research
http://sydney.indymedia.org/node/38748

MJA research
http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/185_06_180906/mea10056_fm.html

There are many contributing factors to this and they are all related and profound. It is ridiculous to believe tha Aboriginal Australia can simply pull up it's socks, get an education and stop whinging.

Mainstream society is destroying itself, ecologically as well as spiritually through a meaningless, media dominated existence of wage slavery. It stands as no beacon of hope for Aboriginal people to aspire to, consequently any assimilationist strategy will fail.

All of us, white and black, need to find hope and spiritual connection to this place, Australia. That means different things for indigenous people to the rest of us, but the essential spirituality of this place is largely defined by Aboriginal people. The repression of this knowledge through pressured conformity to white paradigms is a significant contributing factor to Aboriginal mental health issues. White Australia desperately needs to learn some more of spirituality. The mainstream suicide rate, especially amongst young people is amongst the highest in the world. Our culture is sick but we are so used to it we do not see it in ourselves. As Aboriginal people continue to die, so does the capacity of white Australia to survive in this continent. e.g. Our 200 years of understanding of the changes in the weather is nothing to a meteorology of 40,000 years or more. How can we have a hope of seriously planning and managing water with such ignorance?
Posted by King Canute, Tuesday, 19 September 2006 2:46:21 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The Chinese are very spiritual. The Japanese are animists. The aboriginal clans have their dreamtime. Difference is only the two former seem to accommodate modernity. There is more to it than spirituality. Besides, a new born is not spiritual, rather the child black or white, awaits suvival skills from its familial environment.

If one reads Richard Leakey's, The Sixth Extinction", it becomes evident that Mankindkind has a disasterous impact on the environment, starting in Australia from 60,000 years ago, when there was a huge reduction in the number of animal species.
Posted by Oliver, Thursday, 21 September 2006 5:02:53 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy