The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Tasmanian logging - a law unto itself > Comments

Tasmanian logging - a law unto itself : Comments

By James Rose, published 22/6/2006

Logging giant Gunns ignored the risks and is now paying the price.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All
Readers who are not under an ideological disability may be interested in what Green elder statesman David Suzuki has concluded on the issue of native regrowth forestry at;
http://ianmott.blogspot.com/
Posted by Perseus, Saturday, 24 June 2006 3:36:15 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Here in Western Australia, logging of all old growth forests was stopped the day after the Gallop Labor government won office in 2001. Five years on, the industry is smaller and employs fewer people, while the so-called protected forests (in 35 new national parks) are being seriously degraded by a lack of management. Feral pigs, human interference via trail bikes and uncontrolled firewood removal, spread of dieback fungus, inadequate use of fire for management purposes and lack of silivicultural treatment for those forests logged 50 or more years ago are now major impacts on both old growth and regrowth forests which would have been funded by revenue generated by logging.

The green movement's response is now to try and protect old growthy trees. As well, some small areas of regrowth forest which are of moderate conservation value have shot to the top of the anti-logging hit parade, more to keep green issues alive electorally than to actually make a difference to environmental values on the ground.

The end result is that many of the conservation values that remained in our WA forests after 150 years of logging are now at serious risk because the ideologically driven anti-logging movement has achieved its goals. The movemnet now couldn't care less about the forests they've protected from the chainsaw and have turned a blind eye to the biological chansaws devastating the forests.

Sure, there are problems in Tasmania's forests and Gunns can do better, but logging and the money it provides for management may be the old long-term saviour for many of Australia's forests. This is especially so if urban-based voters don't tell their governments to make more money available for forest management, something I'm not seeing five years after the end of old growth logging in WA.
Posted by Bernie Masters, Monday, 26 June 2006 10:35:16 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Bernie,

brilliant thinking - Cut down more old growth forest in order to save it!!

Trouble is, you are serious.
Posted by last word, Monday, 26 June 2006 2:29:22 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy