The Forum > Article Comments > Jesus was married? So what? > Comments
Jesus was married? So what? : Comments
By David Castles, published 14/6/2006Dan Brown’s literary meanderings are causing pain to the theological cognoscenti.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Page 11
-
- All
I will cite a few of the main sources:-
B.M.Metzger [1987] 90ff
Maintains that seven letters are so similar that they were probably have a common origin
They all have a common prologue and maintain Paul to be a true apostle and are anti-Jewish
Eusebius himself doubts the authenticity of Jude and James epistles.
Discusses 2nd Century opposition to Paul
Marcion was the true successor to Paul
"Clumsy" non-Paul works wree added in the 4th and 5th centuries
.
W. Barnstone [1984],652
Writes about "the third heaven" and the Ascent of Paul
G. Ludemann [1995] 198-9
Calls the fake letters "foolhardy".
Says that of the thirteen letters only 7 are genuine.
Romans, 1 & 2 Corinthians,Galatians, Philippians, 1 Thessalonians & Philemon
Says the rest have been composed by others in the apostles name
G.A. Wells [1975], 17
Claims opponents of (a Gnostic) Paul tampered with his letters, e.g. Irenaeus and Tellurian
I. Wilson [1984] 154
Argues that whoever wrote Timothy and Titus it wasn't Paul. Quotes results of computer tests.
E.Pagels [1975] ,5
Valentian Gnostics cite only a subset of work attributed to Paul.
I could go on but I suggest you do a search for yourself and find a reputable scholar who claims the Pastorals are genuine.
I never claimed that Paul's writing in Greek attested to his gnosticism.
Many Christians would agree about the gnostic nature of Paul. I have met some.
You quote Acts. Nobody claims Paul wrote Acts therefore anything Acts claims about Paul's theology is in doubt and heresay evidence.
Sorry you had an accident. Great to hear about your understanding of Job. I have no understanding of Job. Enlighten us.