The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Federalism is worth preserving > Comments

Federalism is worth preserving : Comments

By James Allan, published 16/5/2006

Labour market reform should happen, but the High Court must side with the states against the Federal Government.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. All
DLC: I hope you'll notice the irony of someone telling you what form of English to speak (or write) when such a person can't manage with any standard form himself or herself.
Posted by shorbe, Sunday, 21 May 2006 8:45:08 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Is there a Howard voter in the house?
Posted by Sly, Sunday, 21 May 2006 11:30:48 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Is there a Howard voter in the house? speak up
Posted by Sly, Sunday, 21 May 2006 11:32:51 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Not here. I don't even vote (as in I'm not even registered) because I don't believe in democracy.
Posted by shorbe, Monday, 22 May 2006 9:46:23 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Response to Remco:

I don't understand your first two questions.

WA does not have one third of Australia's wealth.

The third question, about the relevance of states to labour: When the colonies agreed to federate, they came to an agreement about the powers which were to be given up, and industrial relations law was not such a power, except for the circumstance defined in section 51(xxxv). This agreement as outlined in our constitution is not being respected.

I don't understand your line of argument, but it seems that you suggest that to let federalism die, and hence ignore the fundamental compact which created our nation, is economically advantageous. I disagree, much in the same way that all monopolistic arrangments are disadvantageous. Selling out the constitution, without at least going to the people, seems like a nasty idea too.
Posted by David Latimer, Tuesday, 23 May 2006 12:14:49 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Remco, You should listen to David Latimer he seems to understand whats a stake here. Remco are you one of the Howard voters past or present I have been wanting to hear from?
Posted by Sly, Tuesday, 23 May 2006 12:35:43 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy