The Forum > Article Comments > Liberal, secular and sexist > Comments
Liberal, secular and sexist : Comments
By Tiziana Torresi, published 28/2/2006Does our culture relate the worth of a woman to her sexuality?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Advertisers are suitably faceless and amorphous that its easier to blame them than anyone else. They are just selling the garbs created by designers. There is no social direction given to fashion design, only a desire to make something nove and appleaing, and push boundaries. Societal dress standards moderated the aforementioned process, and that, it seems, is what many people want.
To a certain degree, the sentiments and "culture" (to degrade the word) of the youth of today influence what they want to buy, and to a certain degree it is conformity. That wouldn't be a problem if they were conforming to something that professed to protect dignity and inspire respect, however that is not what the fashions of today do necessarily.
In conclusion, there is no single person or group you can blame for this, no elusive "patriarchy" either seeing as women and making these choices, and (along with the effeminate) are facilitating it by designing. The lack of a voice from "society" means we feel (and are) powerless to enforce the basic standards which would slow and temper the process of change.