The Forum > Article Comments > Flagging a symbolic burning > Comments
Flagging a symbolic burning : Comments
By Stephen Hagan, published 23/2/2006Burn the Aboriginal flag too if you must.
- Pages:
- ‹
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- ›
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
do you know nothing of your heritage?
The term Union Jack possibly dates from Queen Anne's time (reigned 1702-14), but its origin is uncertain. It may come from the 'jack-et' of the English or Scottish soldiers; or from the name of James I who originated the first union in 1603, in either its Latin or French form Jacobus or Jacques; or, as 'jack' once meant small, the name may be derived from a royal proclamation issued by Charles II that the Union Flag should be flown only by ships of the Royal Navy as a jack, a small flag at the bowsprit.
1 St George for England and Wales (noting Wales was a principality and not a sovereign country)
2 St Andrew for Scotland
3 St David for Ireland.
These were the Countries which comprised “the Union” as in “Union-Jack”
So Australians of Irish descent, showing respect at least for the colours of their national saint, should really treat the Union Jack with reverence.
Of course, the Australian Flag has a representation of the Union Jack in one corner because of the shared heritage which Australia owes to the “United Kingdom” (again union / united) which of course, despite the outcome of the 1921 plebiscite in which the Southern Counties of Ireland decided to cede from the Union but in which the Northern Counties voted to remain within the “Union”, thus the Union Jack still has relevance to its origins.
Reynard –“ You're dragging the chain with this invasion stuff. Get over it”
Oh yes, some are a bit “slower” than others.
I recall another thread where I made comment to the transitory nature of “multi-culturalism” and the inevitability that “assimilation” was the only outcome which could produce an effective society.
Yes, alot of people need to stop hankering for “what will never be” and work at improving “what is”.