The Forum > Article Comments > Breaking the Microsoft monopoly > Comments
Breaking the Microsoft monopoly : Comments
By Nicholas Gruen, published 31/10/2005Nicholas Gruen argues the Microsoft monopoly could suffer due to a new OpenDocument standard for office applications.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
-
- All
SL, even if Microsoft were to produce an XML format for Office 12, it will still need to meet the Massachusetts definition of open formats, which they describe as "specifications for data file formats that are based on an underlying open standard, developed by an open community, affirmed and maintained by a standards body and are fully documented and publicly available". You will notice that it says nothing about it having "inferior" capabilities, basically because they are after security, not functionality.
What puzzles me is why they dont just incorporate the ODF standard in a "Save As .odt" capability in the drop-down box. This will meet the Massachusetts requirement, and still enable Microsoft to maintain its own format for those who want any extra features they might need. It's not as though Microsoft doesn't have enough programmers.
And Bruce, please understand this is not about inter-program compatibility, it is about document formatting. The capability of an organizations to keep documents in a format that they *know* can still be read in a hundred years time, because the "rules" under which they are stored/coded are freely available, and not kept under lock and key by a commercial concern that might be tempted to exploit their proprietary format for financial gain.