The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Nauru or Nuremberg? Australia - asylum seekers and war criminals > Comments

Nauru or Nuremberg? Australia - asylum seekers and war criminals : Comments

By Jane McAdam, published 16/12/2005

Jane McAdam argues Australia is protecting war criminals, but not asylum seekers, from torture.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All
Jane
You sure seem to have stirred up some parts of the community. There are many who fear (thanks to the line taken by the Howard government) that we are in danger of being swamped by millions of illegal migrants if we do not have harsh laws which enable us to imprison people for long periods without trial.
How many thousands are there in Australia who have overstayed their visas but have not been hunted down and imprisoned?

We live in a society increasingly governed by fear and so we tolerate the introduction of unjust laws in the belief that we will be protected.

I suppose that if the original inhabitants of Australia had had mandatory detention laws in place at the time of the arrival of the first fleet then things would have been different.
Posted by Peace, Monday, 19 December 2005 1:37:45 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dr Jane McAdam wrote of Australia's 'schizophrenic' implementation of international law'.

The inappropriate use of the term 'schizophrenic' distressed some readers by perpetuating the false notion that schizophrenia means 'split personality'.

SANE Australia StigmaWatch (www.sane.org) wrote to Dr McAdam on 27.01.06, encouraging her to use alternate language to describe a divided or opposite approach to law.

Dr McAdam replied by telephone on 01.02.06, thanking StigmaWatch for bringing the issue to her attention. She expressed concern that she had distressed readers and informed StigmaWatch that she would not be using the term 'schizophrenic' out of the medical context in future.
Posted by Media, Wednesday, 1 February 2006 2:15:41 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy