The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > A new threat to rural Queenslanders? > Comments

A new threat to rural Queenslanders? : Comments

By Mark Leyland, published 4/10/2005

Mark Leyland argues comments made at the Queensland Health Inquiry may foreshadow changes threatening country towns.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All
Mark's article unintentionally builds the case that if local governments's can get their act together they can in many ways resolve some problems of the State government's necessarily broad (and hence insensitive) health strategy.

(Living in country Queensland) I subscribe to the theory that Peter Beattie intentionally set up the Queensland Health Inquiry in such a way that it could be buried.

His refusal to use a judge to preside over it ensured that it would be seen as illegitimate. Tony Morris went in with the best of intentions but he showed human bias - that is guts instead of prudence.

The current inquiry may well peter out the way Beattie originally hoped.
Posted by plantagenet, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 2:44:51 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Mark

Thank you for your thoughtful and timely article. A great read!

I thought that Mr Morris did a great job, but I did not realise that he had suggested the closing of one doctor public hospitals. That would be a tragedy.

And the previous poster has raised some very good points.

Cheers
Kay
Posted by kalweb, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 6:12:11 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I have no idea why you think that the government should heavily subsidize people living in areas which are unviable now and unviable in the future. If small communities have to move because they can't survive without huge subsidies anymore, then thats just the way life is.

An alternative way you might like to look at the distribution of government funds for medical services would be in a question like this :

If the goverment can help 200 people in one region for the same amount it can help 100 in another, where should it spend its money ? If you want to justify why the governement should help the 100 people (versus the 200 people), then you need to provide a convincing reason versus why it isn't better to, say, spend the money much more efficiently in the outer suburbs of Brisbane.
Posted by rc, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 10:34:09 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Mark, What you have written here is so powerfully true.

If you are a journalist who has just read this, its well within the public interest to investigate this situation.

Buried somewhere in all these inquiries are submissios from remote and rural community people asking for better health and hospital care.

The provision of basic health care in many remote communities of Cape York have been by default local government resposibilities for years.

They have by their election as community leaders been given the mother load of responsibilities for the communities they attempt to serve with no little or no resources, no state government support.

And guess what ? You won't here about these local government communities and so you won't know about the problems - and this fact is central to how the Beattie government will appear to "fix the health system".
Posted by Rainier, Wednesday, 5 October 2005 7:02:59 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Rainier - you are spot on.

I have had heaps to do with rural and remote area nurses - their devotion - and their frustrations. But I have to admit, that was before the Beattie Government. The issues have not changed - just the government who resides.

Let's face it, the vote winners are not: people with mental health problems, people of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander heritage, white Australians who live in rural and remote areas.

Shame on you Mr Beattie. Shame on you Professor of Nursing - Heather Beattie.

Cheers
Kay
Posted by kalweb, Wednesday, 5 October 2005 7:51:19 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Good work, Mark.

What concerns me most is that the very last thing the bush needs is this bunch of clowns trying to fix the problems they created. We all know damned well that it wasn't country people who came up with the idea of centralising everything into a big, ignorant bureaucracy.

It was a purely urban concept, designed and implemented by urban people to suit their own agenda. They came up with one health system for the bush and one in the south east. And the people getting killed were all in the bush. They were dispensible.
Posted by Perseus, Thursday, 6 October 2005 11:06:06 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy