Yeah, I'd be intrigued to know too.

As to a modest belief of an ordinary common, a very ground of two first quotes deleted was an iron-clad notion of a status quo on any social change inside societies.

Such a precondition is factually and simply t h e process occurring in a decaying aqua-refers, figurally speaking.

And insisting on "[it] well serves developed countries” – there is, it seems, more explicit reference to a British Commonwealth in an original text of a third message quoted, due to topic - sounds out of this planet as such a club is not functioning in a vacuum and, as recently even at the UN demonstrated while going to deliberate MDG on poverty etc, interests of a British Crown differ from those of the USA, a crucial ally which support cannot be underestimated.