The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Influential bloggers and those who are just sad > Comments

Influential bloggers and those who are just sad : Comments

By Daniel Donahoo, published 22/4/2005

Daniel Donahoo argues that blogging and bloggers are not as influential as they think.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All
Ok Mark –

We could continue to counter examples if we wished. For all your positive examples of people’s experience of blogging, I could produce negative examples of people’s experience of blogging. You'd agree it isn't all one way.

I agree with you that the online communication experience has significant benefits to a whole bunch of isolated people in society. I agree that it brings people together and lets them share ideas and discover new ones. Are blogs and other forms of online communication dynamic and interesting? Yes.

Still, I will I continue to argue thought that blogging, or any screen based activity has changed the world of human relationships for the worse.

Why?

Because it doesn’t ask us to go down to that pub you mentioned and strike up a conversation, try and find a point of common interest - because we just don't have to put in the effort. Home entertainment means we spend less time in more communal environments. Blogging is a step back to engagement after television, video and surfing the net – and everyone is excited about it. But, it still seems to me to be regressive because it denies key aspects of being human.

This line of argument doesn’t fit well into the academic framework you are probably used to. Just like governments or other institutions the academy has its own set method of dialogue - one I am not altogether comfortable with or believe is accessible to a majority of the community.

But, what I am arguing about is the intangible nature of holding someones hand or touching their elbow. The power of non-verbal communication that can let you know the subtle nature of what someone is trying to say. Blogging doesn’t do that. Yes, it engages in the intellectual, but it can not engage in other ways. And most of us are more interested in the emotional, the spiritual and the sublime.

Perhaps we just have to agree to disagree. But really, my broader agenda is about strengthening offline communities, not dismantling online ones.
Posted by Daniel Donahoo, Wednesday, 27 April 2005 7:31:06 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
We may indeed, Daniel.

I'm not sure what you mean by the academic conventions I'm used to.

I'm also interested in building offline community - I just don't think that it's incompatible with online sociality.
Posted by markbah, Wednesday, 27 April 2005 7:52:52 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Too many blogs spoil the melting pot. Editors needed?
Posted by rancitas, Thursday, 12 May 2005 8:29:12 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy