The Forum > Article Comments > Mental health: the DSP or unemployment benefits? > Comments
Mental health: the DSP or unemployment benefits? : Comments
By Tanveer Ahmed, published 26/4/2005Tanveer Ahmed argues the disability support pension could be harming those it is meant to help.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
-
- All
When does the issue of “stress” or many other maladies cross the line between being
“a real problem” to be resolved by social support ?
to
simply a need to grow up and “deal with the issues” of our own life ?
If someone suffers work-stress – as I have done – they can change jobs – as I have done.
If someone needs counselling they can visit a counsellor - as I have done (when needed – and all my own money well spent)
I understand there is an empirical difference between an intellectual disability (limited intellectual capacity), a mental disorder (eg schizophrenia) and a personality based disorder (stress) – if we are to start to assess personality disorders as a basis for “disability” – we are moving the goal posts – and thus changing the population and expectations of those requiring support – whilst that may be virtuous it will also be expensive – as more and more of the “personality disordered” claim support at the expense of the “personality ordered”.
It is very hard on someone who has an “anti-social” personality to function within society – but how much of that “burden” should society “support” and how much of that burden is it the responsibility of the individual to resolve?
Ultimately, we can all find “issues” which inhibit or restrain us from being perfect. Deciding which of those “issues” merit a “pension” and which do not, requires even more than the wisdom of Solomon - which is alot more than you are ever going to find dealing with the folk at Centrelink.