The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > To consent or not to consent - Is age the question? > Comments

To consent or not to consent - Is age the question? : Comments

By Rose Cooper, published 7/3/2005

Rose Cooper discusses the question of the age of consent and poses more questions.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. All
Touche Di. lol.

Reality check, the age of consent law is not (only) about rape of young women or premature marriage. Unfortunately Sex with a minor can be consentual which is why there has to be laws against it for the protection of the vulnerable child. Stick with the facts and leave the red herrings to the rednecks - or you will be easily mistaken for one.
Posted by Rose C, Monday, 21 March 2005 10:42:12 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Oh, so we want laws to protect children, who with consent (despite 'immaturity') are exploited by predators (and society that knows no bounds)?

Now, is that merely related to the 'having' of sex, or the 'type' of sex, and how do we define what age/type is acceptable?

If someone is not mature enough to consent to sex, then are they mature enough to know that gay sex (or married life) is their 'best' option.

Consent does not validate the type of sex.

Hardline, no sex outside marriage, no gay sex, no sex under 16. This ain't going to happen, so just what is the message society wants to give (via education, media, law, actual practice)?

Law is irrelevant if its instructive purpose is denied and punitive purpose not pursued. Do we want to openly promote gay sex as a life affirming option and reality on par with marriage and now, de facto relationships. If we want current consent laws to reflect an equality - either in age &/or practice - then the first order issue - what sex is licit and how old do you need to be to know that?

End game; the law appears to be irrelevant,& is not stopping illegal sex. Is consent law a means of dealing with underage buggery? Is there any point retaining consent laws at all? Will we end up with the ridiculous outcome of ages as low as 12 or 10 eventually?

Sorry,the original thesis is sound. Sex, outside the context of marriage (ie partnering for child bearing & child raising), doesn't make sense in a legal (societal policy) sense unless we want to promote another particular lifestyle & outcome.

What age is a good age for child bearing & rearing? Ask any 15 year old mother and they would probably have preferred to wait a little bit longer to raise a child, but as for the sex, society is saying you don't have to wait or necessarily be cautious...in fact, why bother having one supportive, life long partner (of the opposite sex!?!)... such drudgery and historical nonsense!
Posted by Reality Check, Monday, 21 March 2005 12:22:09 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy