The Forum > Article Comments > Did you want children with that? > Comments
Did you want children with that? : Comments
By Tracy Crisp, published 31/1/2005Tracey Crisp argues that Julia Gillard was damned for not having children, and she would have been damned if she did.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
-
- All
To me it seems likely that children are born with a natural instinct for both a mother and a father, and large scale attempts at social engineering to remove fathers are always likely to fail in the longer term because of that natural instinct.
- Feminist indoctrination machines eventually fail to convince children and younger people to believe that males are no good.
- Attempts by family law systems to remove fathers from families are now failing in most countries.
- Attempts by single women to do away with fathers by having IVF are failing because the children eventually want to know who their father is.
- Attempts by media organisations to eliminate fathers from media articles (like what was done by the author of this article) eventually fail because most readers still want to know about the fathers.
So the human natural instinct to have a father and a mother is overcoming all attempts at man-made social engineering.
I definitely believe that both the mother and the fathers name should be on the birth certificate, which means that the father can have a DNA test done so that he is fully certain of whether or not he is the father of the child. The mother just nominating whatever male she chooses to be the father is not good enough, as eventually the child will want to know who it's natural father is.