hi $15T

The cliff is out there but still off in the distance. But the sky isn't currently falling.

"What evidence do YOU have that the new untested Japanese immigration policy would be ideal for Australia?"

Oh, Mr I-never-provide-evidence wants evidence.

How hard is it for you to understand that if immigration policy is tightened, numbers will fall?

I'm not from Victoria so aren't up on their parochial politics. But it seems strange that you'd be opposed to gaoling opponents given that your were gung-ho about gaoling Trump in 2021. Still it seems Andrews and Allen were likely less than pristine and if the high-biased Vic police could be persuaded to look at them (highly unlikely) then gaol would be a real possibility.

"Ethiopia applies rule 303"

You're confusing them with Breaker Morant.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aj8N8Nvv6y

Hi Trumpster,

Due process of law, that's what Trump was given, found guilty then I was in favour of an appropriate penalty being imposed. Unlike YOu who wanted to put on the buffalo horn outfit and paint your face red, white and blue and storm the Capitol Building with your mates Now these One Nation rednecks that YOU support, want to be in government in November and have the two ex-premiers banged up by December, don't sound like a fair trial, anyway there was no mention of a trial from the Fascists One Nation fella. YOU without evidence is supporting locking them up, claiming gaol would be a real possibility. Why?

"claiming gaol would be a real possibility. Why?"

Why would gaol be a real possibility? Well, if claims that they were corrupt are proven then gaol would be appropriate. Why is that so hard for you to understand. Oh, I forgot. Only your opponents deserve gaol.

BTW, (not that facts matter to you) but Trump was never found guilty on anything to do with J6.

Hi Trumpster,

For YOU rumour alone makes jail a real possibility, for me evidence alone makes jail a real possibility. I gather from your perspective once charged, the guilty should then be required to prove their innocence. In your view should the "guilty" do a "Rommel", it saves a messy trial.

News Flash; Rumour has it Pauline Hanson is corrupt, jail is a real possibility, put her in the cell next to Daffy Donald.

If they get charged and the charges are proven, then gaol is a real possibility. Why is that such a revelation for you?

But in the case of Hanson, gaol is a real possibility because she's upsetting the left.

Hi Trumpster,

I see YOU fail to mention the word trial, is it a dirty word with YOU? I'm in favour of a fair trial for all who have be properly accursed, unlike YOU, I support the presumption of innocence, nothing to do with rumour, until proven guilty by the evidence in a properly constituted court of law. I would never like to see a situation where the presiding judge says; "What is the rumour against the guilty, what do you have to say before I pass sentence."

"But in the case of Hanson, gaol is a real possibility because she's upsetting the left." BUT, isn't she like your folk hero Adolf, a national socialist from the left, so why would her supporters be upset with her?